Bro I never said they didn’t make a difference. I said that Brady makes the difference between playoffs and Super Bowl champs and for the record without Brady there.. they don’t bring in AB and Gronk and they probably draft someone other than an OT. Everything they did was bc Brady came there. Brady makes the difference between Super bowl champs and playoff contender. Once again you can’t just add it you were wrong and just own it.I like how you negate that 4 or 5 new players don't make a difference......just that it's Brady. Give me a break.
It was always Brady. Belicheat did nothing before and now after Brady. Belicheat can’t even do a rebuild.It finally answered the question whether it was Brady or Belichick in New England. Obviously it was Brady and now Belichick doesn’t look so great without Brady on the Patriots.
Our defense should have been able to do that to Mahomes, and put 31 on them too. They didn’t look that great.
They would have been a Super Bowl contender and there’s 20 years worth of data to back it up. Under your reasoning Jameis Winston would have led TB to a Super Bowl title this year and tonight. Who’s theory is ridiculous and who’s is backed up by facts? I showed you proof of the depth chart and you realized you were wrong but instead of just owning it you continue to dig a deeper hole for yourself.New England was a 7-9 team this year. Under your reasoning, keeping 'essentially the same personnel' and keeping Brady, they are a Super Bowl team.
If Booby McCain hadn't left the field for 2 plays we pretty much would have.
Outside the cameras, deflated balls, and what not Romo is right.Romo about Brady " he's done it the right way his whole career".... uhhh yeah NO