What Incog did was brutish, heavy-handed and detestable; I don't think there's too much argument with that outside of the matter of "to what degree/how close to the locker room norm."
However, like 95% of what transpires in the world, this is not a black and white issue. It's (can't believe i'm saying this sheesh) "shades of gray." Just because it's easy to demonize Incog, that doesn't automatically make Martin the innocent "victim." Actually if you consider that "actions truly speak louder than words," a case can be made that as unacceptable as were RI's "words," Martin's 'actions" especially during the last 6 months after those VMs tell more of a story than what looks like a staged dramatic, tray-clanging departure from the cafeteria and puts into question his true intents and who might be pulling his strings.
So for anyone who thinks that Incog is getting a pass by the majority on FH, IMO they're mis-reading the sentiment. If they Martin and what he's wrought is the innocent victim with unintended results, IMO, they're also mis-reading the tea leaves. Just because one was wrong does not by definition make the opposing party right.