LikeUntoGod
The Oracle
No ****te, it gets old fast..................
Tannehill and Sanchez, too little experience?
- Thread starter testtubetimmy
- Start date
No ****te, it gets old fast..................
why did it take 3 years for Tannehill to unseat Jerrod johnson?
alright, that's a good point, so i guess we can assume based on their relative draft positions, # of starts, caliber of supporting rosters, familiarity by HCs, etc, you're asserting that neither one was a reach, eh? Well at least you're being consistent.
Fintastic2124
Active Roster
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2010
- Messages
- 6,266
- Reaction score
- 5,711
Totally agree dude. Our biggest troll comes out of the woodwork every damn time Sancrez is brought up and nothing gets accomplished in such threads.
I honestly don't know whether Tannehill will be a success or not, I'm not a draft guy. I don't just immediately assume they will suck b/c Miami drafted them. You guys are just lucky you have the man who made Brett favre who he was was on your coaching staff.:D
not to mention the guy who deployed him to set then existing franchise offensive records... but of course we're gonna expect the same thing of The Meatball in his new capacity, eh? LOLOLOL
What franchise records did he set? Favre set his career hig in TDs, yards, wins, comp %, yds/att, yds/comp when under coaches besides Sherman and had his career low in INTs w/o Sherman too so when was he setting franchise records w/ Sherman?
and either way he won less w/ Sherman.
tcdrover
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2004
- Messages
- 5,873
- Reaction score
- 642
I would be willing to bet money that Tebow is named the starter after the bye, maybe much sooner than that.
But, it's not a good comparison. Sanchez accomplished much more than Tannehil did in college. It's a horrible comparison. Sanchez looked much more NFL ready than Tannehil. Too many cool aid drinkers around here. Also, meatball is going to make the jests better, that should be obvious to anyone who knows anything about football. They will run the ball more and take a LOT of pressure of sanchize. Less throws mean sanchise will play better.
It is going to be a tough year for us. The Bills are MUCH better. Wannsteadt is a good DC despite all his other shortcomings. WE swept them last year so maybe we continue to match up well against them.
But, it's not a good comparison. Sanchez accomplished much more than Tannehil did in college. It's a horrible comparison. Sanchez looked much more NFL ready than Tannehil. Too many cool aid drinkers around here. Also, meatball is going to make the jests better, that should be obvious to anyone who knows anything about football. They will run the ball more and take a LOT of pressure of sanchize. Less throws mean sanchise will play better.
It is going to be a tough year for us. The Bills are MUCH better. Wannsteadt is a good DC despite all his other shortcomings. WE swept them last year so maybe we continue to match up well against them.
Prior to coaching the Aggies, he served as the head coach of the Green Bay Packers from the 2000 to 2005. Sherman led the Packers to five consecutive winning seasons from 2000–04 and three divisional titles in 2002, 2003, and 2004.[SUP][
[/SUP]In 2000, Sherman became the head coach of the Green Bay Packers. He led the Packers to five consecutive winning seasons from 2000–04. From 2002–2004, he led the Packers to three consecutiveNFC North Division titles. From 2000–04, he compiled a 53–27 record, and a .663 winning percentage, which was the second highest in Packers history, trailing that of Vince Lombardi's, who is one of the most successful coaches in the history of football. Additionally, Green Bay and the Philadelphia Eagles were the only two teams to make the playoffs for four consecutive seasons from 2001–04.An offensive-minded coach, Sherman led the Packers to break franchise records for rushing in 2003 and passing in 2004. In 2003, Packers quarterback Brett Favre led the NFL in touchdown passes, in addition to setting a franchise record for rushing yardage. The 2003 team also gained a total of 442 points, which is the fourth most in franchise history (560 in 2011, 461 in 2009, 456 in 1996, when the team won the Super Bowl).
Call me crazy but the last I looked, from a bottom-line perspective, the Ravens actually did better without Rex and with him.
Other than that, I find it ironic that the most accurate QB on the jets by far is their 3rd stringer (at least for now LOL)
if you put sanchez and tebow together, you'd have a quarterback that completes exactly 100 percent of the passes. Not bad. He'd also be named SanBow Techez. oh and his ass would be a virgin. Literaly his ass. get it, cause sanchez likes it in the butt.
Bill's on a roll today, keep em' coming. LMFAO.
tcdrover
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2004
- Messages
- 5,873
- Reaction score
- 642
Did you see that quote by Gronkowsky a few weeks ago?
Looks like he has something special for Tebow.
Sanchize's biggest problem is that his HC fell in love with him before they drafted him and spoiled the crap out of him after they signed him.
wow 5 consecutive winning seasons in the mighty NFC Central/North. Pretty impressive.
1992-1999 postseason: 9-5 record, 3 NFC title games, 2 SB apps, 1 SB win
2000-2005 w/ Sherman: 2-4 record, lost first ever playoff game at Lambeau(had so much fun they did it twice), never made it past div rd.
2006-2011: 5-3, 2 NFC title game apps, 1 SB app, 1 SB title
3 years since Rex left the Jets made 2 title games and Bal 1.
I think rex said that sanchez had the best feet of any QB of that draft.
In the 3 years since Rex left, Balt had 3 winning seasons, 2 12-4 recordss, 2 Div Championships... and Rex a legitimate one winning season 11-5 (not counting charity that was so egregious that the league immediately changed its scheduling policies) in 2010 and no divisional championships. Doesn't look like the Ravens missed him at all, eh? :idk: