Tannehill and Wallace

[Phinatic8u]

No doubt.

Someone in another thread said Lazor made a few comments indicating Tanny needed to improve next week. I'm trying to find the article.

I read it, Tanny said he needs to get better too, Lazor has been said to be a hard ass and I fully expect a better qb against buffalo.

 

[lurking]

I love Tannehill, I really do. I don't like Wallace. But people are focusing on the throw and where Wallace's feet were instead of focusing on what you point out - the ball should have gotten out as soon as Wallace roasted revis - TOTALLY AGREE. Anyone think Peyton, Rogers, Marino etc would have missed that? No way. But this is the theme w Ryan - I really think he waits too long to get the ball out when going down field. I know he was pressured on this one. I'm just talking in general which is why the long throws are late and off too often. Needs to sling it out there instead of trying to be too perfect. At least that's what my non-qualified football eyes tell me.

What on earth are you talking about, Tanny was running for his life, did you not see VW on his a$$ interrupting that timing thing you speak of. Wallace caught the ball but got lazy and didn't drag or stab the landing.

 

[enigmatics]

I read it, Tanny said he needs to get better too, Lazor has been said to be a hard ass and I fully expect a better qb against buffalo.

I'm so glad to hear Lazor doesn't hold back when it comes to coaching Tanny. I felt he was babied by Sherman.

 

[FinfanInBuffalo]

I guarantee you at film study, Lazor will say throw the ball earlier and inside.

As soon as Wallace beat Revis on the double move boom let it fly.

Not possible to throw it earlier. He had to avoid a pass rusher. He gets rid of it as soon as he can and in plenty of time. Wallace was three yards from the back of the end zone.

 

[Dick Pepperwood]

I guarantee you at film study, Lazor will say throw the ball earlier and inside.

As soon as Wallace beat Revis on the double move boom let it fly.

This Dude ^

 

[EmperorPhin]

Also helps we threw every pass to Wallace

 

[enigmatics]

Also helps we threw every pass to Wallace

Sure seemed like they were trying to make a point. But then again, they have a good secondary and Wallace was the only guy with the talent to actually do something against it, particularly speed-wise.

 

[VCU2000]

I dont put much blame on RT for the long TD where Wallace didnt get his feet in. That ball looked perfect to me. Wallace caught it in bounds, but didnt seem to realize how close he was to the sideline.

Need to look again, it was a bad throw. He just failed to set his feet and the ball was wide. Should have been an easy six.

 

[Joe Dolfan]

It didn't look like a bad throw to me. Wallace just had to catch it in the bread basket, as usual, and stepped out of bounds.

 

[dolpns13]

disagree. Because of the ball placement, even though wallace had control, it took him too long to be able to look up field at the defenders coming becuase he was still trying to correct for the pass behind him. Had the pass been in front his eyes would have been on the defenders and fumble unlikely too happen.

So with that being said, IYO it is the OLmens fault if a RB runs through a small hole and gets the ball stripped.

---------- Post added at 08:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:37 AM ----------

Some of you are too funny. If a player has possession of the ball then fumbles it then it is his fault and his fault only.

isnt it.. and then when he throws two TD passes those people mysteriously disappear.

 

[psfign]

Need to look again, it was a bad throw. He just failed to set his feet and the ball was wide. Should have been an easy six.

Nope...the ball was in bounds. Should have been caught. He even had his back to the sideline when he caught it. But youre right...it should have been an easy 6.

---------- Post added at 07:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:49 AM ----------

So with that being said, IYO it is the OLmens fault if a RB runs through a small hole and gets the ball stripped.

---------- Post added at 08:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:37 AM ----------



isnt it.. and then when he throws two TD passes those people mysteriously disappear.

Cant compare the two. The lineman didnt put the ball in the RBs hands in a position to get hit.

And why would someone complain when there's a TD pass? Neither of your points make any sense.

 

[FinaticalOne]

The length people go to to discredit Tannehill is too funny.

Sent from my Nexus 7 FHD

I'm not sure if anyone is trying to discredit Tannehill. I'm a Tannehill backer, but he could've thrown a much better ball, I also know Wallace should've done a better job securing the ball. They BOTH could've done a better job to prevent that turnover. Even analyst/QB Trent Green pointed out the pass was errant. Tannehill's accuracy was inconsistent last Sunday, I love the fact he was able to play much better in the second half which proves he's the type of competitor I want on my team. If Lazor plans to run a lot of crossing routes (which I love), Tannehill needs to throw better passes on those routes before he gets one of our WRs killed. I know Tannehill will right the ship and continue improving, feels good to be 1-0, especially when that win is from beating the Pats.

 

[psfign]

I think we've beat this to death. There's certainly validity to both sides.

 

[AL R]

I think we've beat this to death. There's certainly validity to both sides.

True, like what Hayden said in the game thread, do I have to pick a side? Just want them to keep trying to figure it out.

 

[FSU Truth]

I think we've beat this to death. There's certainly validity to both sides.

I think this is the point some are missing....Tannehill should have made a better throw and Wallace should have held on to it...enough blame on that play for both sides...