Tannehill calls out Philbin | Page 5 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Tannehill calls out Philbin

I could be wrong but wasn't 93' the year Marino went down with the Achilles injury and we went through a bunch of QB s that year ! And 1995 should have been a good year also as we had a lot of high priced free agency players that couldn't play together! Alot of those years were still good years 86 team wasnt too much different frim the good 85 team! And we were lucky to do as good in 93 considering the injuries to qbs! Shula took and got the most out of those qbs that year!

I understand this time in question. But as was stated "8-8 was unacceptable".

I just get tired of people who push Shula as some god. Especially when his work with Marino, in retrospect, came up short.

---------- Post added at 07:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:26 PM ----------

I could be wrong but wasn't 93' the year Marino went down with the Achilles injury and we went through a bunch of QB s that year ! And 1995 should have been a good year also as we had a lot of high priced free agency players that couldn't play together! Alot of those years were still good years 86 team wasnt too much different frim the good 85 team! And we were lucky to do as good in 93 considering the injuries to qbs! Shula took and got the most out of those qbs that year!

I was previously told Shula did not partake in FA. Glad to see it is now a known he embraced it because of his failures in drafting.
 
Okay than. If the coach feels that way about his QB than he should f***ing replace him. Not sit on the f***ing ball wit 2:20 to go in the half with all of your timeouts and trailing 9-0.
Yep. He should replace him.
 
Okay than. If the coach feels that way about his QB than he should f***ing replace him. Not sit on the f***ing ball wit 2:20 to go in the half with all of your timeouts and trailing 9-0.

The offense as a whole gave or showed nothing to allow a HC to do what you ask. The line was being dominated. The running game was putrid. The wrs couldn't catch a cold. The qb couldn't hit the broad side of a barn.

But hey, go for it, turn it over...and you people would still be bitching about something.
 
Okay than. If the coach feels that way about his QB than he should f***ing replace him. Not sit on the f***ing ball wit 2:20 to go in the half with all of your timeouts and trailing 9-0.

Amen. That decision was cowardice.

And NOT calling a TO after Watkins' phantom TD was another blown Philbin call. You have to take that chance.
 
You didn't watch much football back then right?

The AFC East was a dog pound. We beat the crap out of each other. In 1989 Bills won the division at 9-7. In 1991 the Jets went to the playoffs at 8-8. In 93 we started 9-2 and lost the last 5 and in 1996 the AFC East send three teams to the playoffs: Bills, Pats and Colts.

You are like NYJunc and doing selective history. You disregard that we were outside those years you listed in the 90s potential playoff contenders and even in those "mediocre" years we were in playoff contention.

The only two years I give you is 86 and 88. 1987 was a strike shortened season anyways.

IDC what you "give" me. I was told 8-8 was unacceptable. But point out those years with a few 9-7 seasons, and I get excuses.
 
86 to 89, 91_ 93_95. That's 7 years of mediocre football under Shula with Marino. He got fat and lazy once he got a great in the 80s.

We fell into mediocrity '86-'89. However, I disagree w the 90's - we had playoff teams that won some games - beat the Chiefs 2x in the 90's and the Chargers - so that's three seasons there we were not a one and done team. Our problem was Buffalo was the class of the AFC and no one was going to beat them in the playoffs during their SB streak - they were a complete team in all facets and they had a pretty easy time by NFL standards winning the conference 90'-'93. We gave them some of their toughest playoff football during that time. But...we always had a shot.
 
I understand this time in question. But as was stated "8-8 was unacceptable".

I just get tired of people who push Shula as some god. Especially when his work with Marino, in retrospect, came up short.

---------- Post added at 07:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:26 PM ----------



I was previously told Shula did not partake in FA. Glad to see it is now a known he embraced it because of his failures in drafting.

I don't recall having said much about Marino as we all know Marino was great and could do alot with out much of a run game etc! My main arguement was that Shula got the most out of his players and coached them as such! Such as the Woodley/Strock experiment! How many coaches would have switched Qbs like that! Or the 93 season when Marino went down and went through a slew of Qbs thst year in which Shula played a 3rd stringer once Mitchell went down and got a victory ! Was it pretty no but he played to his players strengths!
 
Handing over the 1st half with 2:00 minutes left...IS THE MOVE OF A LOSER! Period.
 
We all know the reason Philbin played it safe is because the way Tannehill was playing there was ZERO chance we were scoring. I generally despise gutless decisions like that but in this case it totally made sense because the odds of Tannehill turning the ball over in that situation if they tried to push it were astronomically high. It shocks me to hear Tannehill talk like this because after the game Philbin has been twisting reality into a pretzel trying not to call out Tannehill for his intensely ****ty play.

Bull throw the darn ball all 3 times way downfield and if you hit one fine if not even on a interception our defense was playing well enough to hold them today, too much RT hate here to make a rational judgement call on that one from the folks agreeing with Philbin especially with 3 time outs in Philbins back pocket. Special teams definitly contibuted heavily in the loss today,
 
I guess I spoke too soon when I said Tannehill was a coach killer but, at least he dosent throw his coaching staff and teammates under the bus for his failures.

You know what........ STFU Ryan Tannehill. If you had given the coaching staff a reason to think you could do something other than turn it over or go 3 and out and give Buffalo another scoring chance before the half, they wouldnt have tried to kill the clock there. MAN UP and take responsibility for your ****ty play.

Eat **** Ryan Tannehill. Start acting like RG3 and this is going to be a lot worse for you.

Give Philbin a reason besides your ****ty play to start the better QB who is sitting the bench right now. Philbin obviously needs a reason. He clearly isnt smart enough to see Moore gives us the best chance to win. At least Moore would act like a ****ing MAN too and not blame his coaches and teammates if he plays like ****.

**** Ryan Tannehill. Goofy bastard.

What the OP wrote is not what he said. Did you watch the video?
 
We fell into mediocrity '86-'89. However, I disagree w the 90's - we had playoff teams that won some games - beat the Chiefs 2x in the 90's and the Chargers - so that's three seasons there we were not a one and done team. Our problem was Buffalo was the class of the AFC and no one was going to beat them in the playoffs during their SB streak - they were a complete team in all facets and they had a pretty easy time by NFL standards winning the conference 90'-'93. We gave them some of their toughest playoff football during that time. But...we always had a shot.

Those Chief teams were laughable. I got a kick out of the all crap my Chief fans/friends talked each year. I always laughed at 'Marty Ball'. Outside of Vermiel, I've always had a good laugh at the Chiefs expense.
 
http://www.miamidolphins.com/multim...-Offense/0c0e7337-3917-42a8-9f51-039b2fa0d202

I don't defend either but, Tannehill wanted to run the 2 min offense before the half and he said it was Philbin's call to hand off, and hand off, and..you get the point.

Why not drive and score coach?
would be nice to see him get benched for it...we all know philbin doesn't want leaders in the locker-room...all of his leaders from his first season were gone 1st chance he had to drop them...
 
He handed off because he lacks confidence in his quarterback to their accurate passes.
 
would be nice to see him get benched for it...we all know philbin doesn't want leaders in the locker-room...all of his leaders from his first season were gone 1st chance he had to drop them...


Get over it already.
 
Back
Top Bottom