:crazy: Like the two to Wallace and Sims the first week?
I like how your profile pic lets everyone know that you have zero understanding of what you're watching.
:crazy: Like the two to Wallace and Sims the first week?
This Year:
Tannehill: 419 Passing Yards 3TD's 2 Ints 60.5% Completion Previous Year: 3913 Passing Yards 24 TD'S 17 Ints 60.4% Completion (1-1 beat the Pat's)
Luck: 542 Passing Yards 5 TD'S 3 Ints Previous Year: 3822 Passing Yards 23 TD'S 9 Ints 60.2% Completion ( 0-2 came up short twice in the 4th quarter of each game and played terrible vs Philly)
RG3: 305 Passing Yards 0 TD'S 0 Ints 77.5% Completion Previous Year: 3203 Passing Yards 16 TD'S 12 Ints 60.1% Completion (1-1 Injured yet again)
Foles: 653 Passing Yards 3 TD'S 2 Ints Previous Year: 2891 Passing Yards 27 TD's 2 Ints 64.0% Completion (2-0 not the same QB of last year, Sproles is doing wonders and saving him)
Two games in and we already have the season figured out...can we at least get to the bye before we start talking QB in the first round...
Here's an example of an established "franchise" QB
Week 1: 31-43 448 yards 3tds 0ints
Week 2: 24-44 231 yards 1td 3ints
In this league you are going to get a lot of Jekyll and Hyde performances....take the season as a whole.
I like how your profile pic lets everyone know that you have zero understanding of what you're watching.
When did Thill throw a int in Buff?? I thought he only had one int this year against NE?
When did Thill throw a int in Buff?? I thought he only had one int this year against NE?
It was late in the game when traditionally the backup would be in there if not to spark a stagnate offense to keep the starter from getting hurt in garbage time. I wonder why the new NFL is not like back in the day when a backup QB was actually useful? I remember many games where the starter would be stagnate and game going south with little to lose Shula would trot out Strock or the next scrub. They act as if its a rule against such things now.
It was late in the game when traditionally the backup would be in there if not to spark a stagnate offense to keep the starter from getting hurt in garbage time. I wonder why the new NFL is not like back in the day when a backup QB was actually useful? I remember many games where the starter would be stagnate and game going south with little to lose Shula would trot out Strock or the next scrub. They act as if its a rule against such things now.
It was late in the game when traditionally the backup would be in there if not to spark a stagnate offense to keep the starter from getting hurt in garbage time. I wonder why the new NFL is not like back in the day when a backup QB was actually useful? I remember many games where the starter would be stagnate and game going south with little to lose Shula would trot out Strock or the next scrub. They act as if its a rule against such things now.
Garbage time or not it was a horrible throw. Obviously trotting out Matt Moore is ridiculous at this point but if you guys look at Tannehill's last 4 games and aren't concerned, your objectivity is being clouded by hope.
Selective memory. Shula didn't do that with Griese or Marino.
Of course the team performance as a whole was pathetic but ignoring the issues at he most important position is short sighted. Whether they knew it was coming or not does not take away that in a day full of inaccurate passes, it was another one.All QB's have those ints....it is a desperate end of the game play that the opposition knows is coming...
but to look at the isues on the team as only Tannehill is short sighted as well and somewhat agenda driven
Garbage time or not it was a horrible throw. Obviously trotting out Matt Moore is ridiculous at this point but if you guys look at Tannehill's last 4 games and aren't concerned, your objectivity is being clouded by hope.