Tannehill, Luck ,RG3 , Foles | Page 5 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Tannehill, Luck ,RG3 , Foles

This Year:

Tannehill: 419 Passing Yards 3TD's 2 Ints 60.5% Completion Previous Year: 3913 Passing Yards 24 TD'S 17 Ints 60.4% Completion (1-1 beat the Pat's)

Luck: 542 Passing Yards 5 TD'S 3 Ints Previous Year: 3822 Passing Yards 23 TD'S 9 Ints 60.2% Completion ( 0-2 came up short twice in the 4th quarter of each game and played terrible vs Philly)

RG3: 305 Passing Yards 0 TD'S 0 Ints 77.5% Completion Previous Year: 3203 Passing Yards 16 TD'S 12 Ints 60.1% Completion (1-1 Injured yet again)

Foles: 653 Passing Yards 3 TD'S 2 Ints Previous Year: 2891 Passing Yards 27 TD's 2 Ints 64.0% Completion (2-0 not the same QB of last year, Sproles is doing wonders and saving him)

When did Thill throw a int in Buff?? I thought he only had one int this year against NE?
 
Two games in and we already have the season figured out...can we at least get to the bye before we start talking QB in the first round...

Here's an example of an established "franchise" QB

Week 1: 31-43 448 yards 3tds 0ints

Week 2: 24-44 231 yards 1td 3ints

In this league you are going to get a lot of Jekyll and Hyde performances....take the season as a whole.

Some people are more excited when Tannehill has a bad game then they are if the Fins win so they can rush and post a new thread on why Tannehill sucks.

Two games completed and 400 threads from the QB experts.

Sent from my Nexus 7 FHD
 
When did Thill throw a int in Buff?? I thought he only had one int this year against NE?

It was late in the game when traditionally the backup would be in there if not to spark a stagnate offense to keep the starter from getting hurt in garbage time. I wonder why the new NFL is not like back in the day when a backup QB was actually useful? I remember many games where the starter would be stagnate and game going south with little to lose Shula would trot out Strock or the next scrub. They act as if its a rule against such things now.
 
It was late in the game when traditionally the backup would be in there if not to spark a stagnate offense to keep the starter from getting hurt in garbage time. I wonder why the new NFL is not like back in the day when a backup QB was actually useful? I remember many games where the starter would be stagnate and game going south with little to lose Shula would trot out Strock or the next scrub. They act as if its a rule against such things now.

Selective memory. Shula didn't do that with Griese or Marino.
 
It was late in the game when traditionally the backup would be in there if not to spark a stagnate offense to keep the starter from getting hurt in garbage time. I wonder why the new NFL is not like back in the day when a backup QB was actually useful? I remember many games where the starter would be stagnate and game going south with little to lose Shula would trot out Strock or the next scrub. They act as if its a rule against such things now.

Ok cool thanks!
 
It was late in the game when traditionally the backup would be in there if not to spark a stagnate offense to keep the starter from getting hurt in garbage time. I wonder why the new NFL is not like back in the day when a backup QB was actually useful? I remember many games where the starter would be stagnate and game going south with little to lose Shula would trot out Strock or the next scrub. They act as if its a rule against such things now.

Have to love those garbage ints....
 
Garbage time or not it was a horrible throw. Obviously trotting out Matt Moore is ridiculous at this point but if you guys look at Tannehill's last 4 games and aren't concerned, your objectivity is being clouded by hope.
 
Garbage time or not it was a horrible throw. Obviously trotting out Matt Moore is ridiculous at this point but if you guys look at Tannehill's last 4 games and aren't concerned, your objectivity is being clouded by hope.

All QB's have those ints....it is a desperate end of the game play that the opposition knows is coming...

but to look at the isues on the team as only Tannehill is short sighted as well and somewhat agenda driven
 
All QB's have those ints....it is a desperate end of the game play that the opposition knows is coming...

but to look at the isues on the team as only Tannehill is short sighted as well and somewhat agenda driven
Of course the team performance as a whole was pathetic but ignoring the issues at he most important position is short sighted. Whether they knew it was coming or not does not take away that in a day full of inaccurate passes, it was another one.
 
Garbage time or not it was a horrible throw. Obviously trotting out Matt Moore is ridiculous at this point but if you guys look at Tannehill's last 4 games and aren't concerned, your objectivity is being clouded by hope.

I am more concerned about the play of the offense as a whole than any one player. Despite what the haters say, this team is not a QB away from consistent competitiveness. Period.
 
Back
Top Bottom