Tannehill vs Luck Updated

[nyjunc]

this was much funnier.. at any time between 09 and now:

and finally:

funny? No, it's truthful. What you post would be considered is SAD that a grown man saves every post of another man. It's stalking.


You are an average fan, I get it. How come you are here this week when you disappeared after the Bucs loss?

 

[Vaark]

funny? No, it's truthful. What you post would be considered is SAD that a grown man saves every post of another man. It's stalking.


You are an average fan, I get it. How come you are here this week when you disappeared after the Bucs loss?

First, I don't get paid like you do to spread your BS.. As a true fan, I feel it and sometimes need time off. As a weekday 9 to 5'er you get paid to be here and TGG, propagandizing whether the jest win or lose. I even question the extent of the passion you claim to feel for the jest as a fan.

And NO, it's calling out BS -knowing that revisionist history can't be deleted if archived (in this case I was kind leaving out a lot more TGG members who going back to when you claim you were indicting Sanchez for poor play, were calling you out for continuing to defend him). You can't weasel out of your opinions anymore on TGG, why should we allow you to do so here? But, it's funny, the FH squatter with almost 500 more "No Thanks" than his closest competitor calling out a true fan for taking a mental hiatus from his own forum. :up: Do your employers know that a cross-section of members consider you are so devoid of credibility on here?

Oh and "stalking" is hackng into my password protected image account when even I need to have the pw to get in.

 

[nyjunc]

First, I don't get paid like you do to spread your BS.. As a true fan, I feel it and sometimes need time off. As a weekday 9 to 5'er you get paid to be here and TGG, propagandizing whether the jest win or lose. I even question the extent of the passion you claim to feel for the jest as a fan.

And NO, it's calling out BS -knowing that revisionist history can't be deleted if archived (in this case I was kind leaving out a lot more TGG members who going back to when you claim you were indicting Sanchez for poor play, were calling you out for continuing to defend him). You can't weasel out of your opinions anymore on TGG, why should we allow you to do so here? But, it's funny, the FH squatter with almost 500 more "No Thanks" than his closest competitor calling out a true fan for taking a mental hiatus from his own forum. :up: Do your employers know that a cross-section of members consider you are so devoid of credibility on here?

Oh and "stalking" is hackng into my password protected image account when even I need to have the pw to get in.

maybe some day when you acquire the knowledge necessary to get paid for your opinions you will. I am trying to teach you but you don't want to learn, you'd rather spread lies and ignore the truth. That's ok but don't bash me b/c I know more than you.


I didn't hack into anything, the stalker is the one that has 12+ pages of bad photoshops dedicated to me, the one that follows me on every board, the one that saves all my posts. Everything you whine about me describes you exactly, sounds like someone has some issues and needs to look in the mirror.

---------- Post added at 11:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:56 AM ----------

I don't know which is sadder, the fact that you think you know something b/c fellow phin homers "thank" your posts or the fact that you think some losers giving me "no thanks" means anything. Such a sad man, I really do feel sorry for you.

 

[DuderinoN703]

please stop looking at blind stats, there is absolutely no comparison btw the 2. That doesn't mean Ryan is bad but he's nowhere near Luck no matter what the #s say. It's not about the overall #s, it's about how you got there that matters.

This coming from a guy who think Sanchez is a good QB

 

[ciscoholgate]

This coming from a guy who think Sanchez is a good QB

Yeah JUNK's opinion on QBs carries so little weight.

 

[nyjunc]

This coming from a guy who think Sanchez is a good QB

Mark Sanchez playoff wins in 4 seasons as a starting QB: 4
Miami Dolphins playoff wins 1993-2012: 4

Mark was a terrible QB in 2012 but was good his first 3 years and would have been good this year.

---------- Post added at 12:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:05 PM ----------

Yeah JUNK's opinion on QBs carries so little weight.

to those that don't know the game, to those that just look at ratings and stats

 

[ciscoholgate]

to those that don't know the game, to those that just look at ratings and stats

Keep telling yourself Sanchez is a "Franchise QB" and I really hope the Jest organization agrees too.
That still doesn't change the fact that Sanchez blows and you don't know jack about QBs. JUNK.

 

[Digital]

please stop looking at blind stats, there is absolutely no comparison btw the 2. That doesn't mean Ryan is bad but he's nowhere near Luck no matter what the #s say. It's not about the overall #s, it's about how you got there that matters.

OK, well if it weren't for Karlos Dansby and Sean Smith both dropping gift-wrapped INT's last year Tannehill would be 2-0 vs. Luck. He is 2-0 vs. Dalton, 1-0 vs Wilson and even 1-0 vs. Wheedon.

That's how he got there.

Can Newton is playing well and the Carolina defense is dominating. It will be fun to see if Tannehill can do it against the previous guy the media wanted to annoint into Canton based on his rookie season.

Let's face it, Newton set a record for most yards in a game for rookie QB's and was named Rookie of the week and Player of the week. Tannehill throws for 1 yard less and isn't even in consideration for Player of he week ... hell he didn't even win Rookie of the week, they gave it to last years rookie-Canton fast tracker RGIII.

Because the reality is, the media loves the Dolphins failing and isn't really interested in any successes we may have. But back to the clown car, that's another of the media's favorite stories.

 

[nyjunc]

OK, well if it weren't for Karlos Dansby and Sean Smith both dropping gift-wrapped INT's last year Tannehill would be 2-0 vs. Luck. He is 2-0 vs. Dalton, 1-0 vs Wilson and even 1-0 vs. Wheedon.

That's how he got there.

Can Newton is playing well and the Carolina defense is dominating. It will be fun to see if Tannehill can do it against the previous guy the media wanted to annoint into Canton based on his rookie season. I mean, let's face it, Newton set a record for most yards in a game for rookie QB's and was named Rookie of the week and Player of the week. Tannehill throws for 1 yard less and isn't even in consideration for Player of he week ... hell he didn't even win Rookie of the week, they gave it to last years rookie-Canton fast tracker RGIII. Because let's face it, the media loves the Dolphins failing and isn't really interested in any successes we may have. But back to the clown car, that's always enjoyable.

if they don't call a questionable penalty against Seattle to wipe out an INt that would have cost Miami that game they lose that one. We can play the what if game all day but the bottom line is Luck led his team to 11 wins and a playoff app, Ryan hasn't even had his team in a playoff race.

 

[Vaark]

if they don't call a questionable penalty against Seattle to wipe out an INt that would have cost Miami that game they lose that one. We can play the what if game all day but the bottom line is Luck led his team to 11 wins and a playoff app, Ryan hasn't even had his team in a playoff race.

sez the guy who has 2 wins this season TB and NE based on penalties, rather than merit.

 

[nyjunc]

Keep telling yourself Sanchez is a "Franchise QB" and I really hope the Jest organization agrees too.
That still doesn't change the fact that Sanchez blows and you don't know jack about QBs. JUNK.

I know much more about QB play than you. You don't win 4 road playoff games in 2 years w/ poor QB play. Isn't it amazing how great Ryan is w/o getting his team in a playoff race yet mark sucked and has won the 3rd most playoff games since entering the league?

---------- Post added at 12:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:14 PM ----------

sez the guy who has 2 wins this season TB and NE based on penalties, rather than merit.

they were both legit penalties and if they don't called a shaky one on a Hill TD we may not need the 2nd one against NE. It must really suck to sit around and make excuses all day long, such a sad man.

 

[TheJetsBlow]

Of course I hope he doesn't pan out but where have I said that will happen? the problem is you guys are getting ahead of yourselves yet again. To compare him to Luck is beyond laughable.



Your RBs are fine, even w/ OL issues Miller is averaging 4.5 YPC, you guys just abandon the run game b/c you trust Ryan more than you should and that is a big reason why you are only 5-5 w/ more talent.



Oh it was Ryan, your D played no role. Got it. your D had to face Indy's O 3 times protecting a 4 pt lead in the 4th qtr- 3 possessions against one of the best late game QBs in the league but it was Ryan who willed you to victory

how are 14 TDs and 6 INts comparable to 14 and 11? Ryan has almost DOUBLE the amount of INTs. his leading rusher averages LESS than 3 YPC.

Is 7-3 better than 5-5?

Just like the Jet defense had nothing to do with Sanchez winning those playoff games, but that doesn't seem to ever deter you in that argument. Rofl, go worry about your own damn team.

 

[ciscoholgate]

I know much more about QB play than you. You don't win 4 road playoff games in 2 years w/ poor QB play. Isn't it amazing how great Ryan is w/o getting his team in a playoff race yet mark sucked and has won the 3rd most playoff games since entering the league?

You don't know jack about QBs because you can get over your school girl crush for Sanchez.
Fact is Sanchez was terrible in the 4th quarter and on 3rd downs in his playing career.

I have yet to call Tannehill great. He's decent right now and still has upside but has yet to show he is a Franchise QB.
Just admit it JUNK, you don't know jack about QBs and you can pull up those wins form so many years ago to try to prove you case, but the fact remains Sanchez sucks donkey balls and you and his mom are the only ones still defending him .

 

[nyjunc]

Just like the Jet defense had nothing to do with Sanchez winning those playoff games, but that doesn't seem to ever deter you in that argument. Rofl, go worry about your own damn team.

They absolutely did, where have I ever said they didn't? I have always said we won w/ D first but much better Ds than ours didn't win the way we did in postseason and w/ supposed much better QBs too.

You don't know jack about QBs because you can get over your school girl crush for Sanchez.
Fact is Sanchez was terrible in the 4th quarter and on 3rd downs in his playing career.

I have yet to call Tannehill great. He's decent right now and still has upside but has yet to show he is a Franchise QB.
Just admit it JUNK, you don't know jack about QBs and you can pull up those wins form so many years ago to try to prove you case, but the fact remains Sanchez sucks donkey balls and you and his mom are the only ones still defending him .

Sanchez was terrible in the 4th qtr? interesting. you may want to go back and research that. Until then you really shouldn't bash others knowledge of QBs.

 

[FinfanInBuffalo]

nowhere near as good as mark(neither is Ryan)

Now this is truly funny