Every bit of data I've ever posted here is independently verifiable. We don't need to talk about me to talk about the data. You can verify it yourself and discredit it if need be, or you can interpret it in your own way. Again, who I am and what I do has nothing to do with that process.
Of course, it's a whole lot easier to believe one has "discredited" the evidence by discrediting the person, rather than investigating the data oneself and interpreting them another way, but the target has been misplaced in that instance. The data are still there, regardless of who's posting them, and regardless of how credible the person posting them is believed to be.
"If we can believe this guy who calls himself "shouright" on a message board is biased, then Ryan Tannehill really isn't just average, since that's what that guy is saying." This isn't true, however. I can be as biased as the day is long, and Ryan Tannehill can still be just average. :)