The whole point is Lock isn't very good and certainly not worth that.
Incorrect. Go google Eagles trade for 2 pick. Google Rams trade for 1 pick. Google Chiefs trade for 10 pick.
Now let's look at Lock and Haskins, and compare them to Goff, Mahomes, and Wentz.
Again, they can all throw anywhere on the field, from the pocket, have a gun, mobility, frame, all that. All those things equal, except you can automatically eliminate Wentz as being better because he threw for 360 attempts in a 16- game season, which is too low, he is not as good the others. But let's presume he can carry a larger load like the others and give him that benefit of doubt.
Haskins 70%
Mahomes 65%
Goff 64 %
Wentz 64%
Lock 63%
Lock is not as good as Goff Mahomes and Haskins, but it's close.
Let's look at interceptions.
Haskins 67 atttempts per interception
Mahomes 59 attempts per interception
Lock 55 attempts per interception
Goff 41 attempts per interception
Wentz 36 attempts per interception (at low volume)
Let's look at sacks
Lock 34 attempts per sacks
Haskins 27 attempts per sack
Mahomes 22 attempts per sacks
Goff 21 attempts per sack
Wentz 18 attempts per sacks
We can eliminate Wentz. He is just not as good. Consistently at the bottom of comparables.
Let's look at scoring
Haskins 11 attempts per TD
Goff 12 attempts per TD
Mahomes 14 attempts per TD
Wentz 15 attempts per TD
Lock 16 attempts per TD.
Haskins dominates. Lock is close enough. He is not as elite as Goff and Mahomes, but he is up there. Beats them in the pocket game, he is borderline in scoring and completion percentage, but so was Wentz.
Yes, the compensation would be fair, and yes both Haskins and Lock are worth it.