This No-call At The End Of Regulation Is Inexcusable! | Page 4 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

This No-call At The End Of Regulation Is Inexcusable!

ANUFan said:
Wow, Are you serious? They're that good that they didn't commit a penalty in any phase of the game?
Click to expand...
actually they got a bullshit call that offset a penalty, but its uncanny how they never get a call that calls back a big play…puck those cheaters
 
terphin said:
actually they got a bullshit call that offset a penalty, but its uncanny how they never get a call that calls back a big play…puck those cheaters
Click to expand...

They are masters of the B.S. pick plays as well. Springing guys wide open for big yardage and TDs.
 
terphin said:
actually they got a bullshit call that offset a penalty, but its uncanny how they never get a call that calls back a big play…puck those cheaters
Click to expand...
Offsetting penalties are crap. If one team benefits from offsetting calls,(usually the offense) then it’s still penalizing the defense.
 
Ridiculous to not call that one.... especially with the ref standing right there
 
It absolutely pisses me off that New England Green Bay and Pittsburgh are always setting pick plays to get open and are never called for it. The few times Miami does they’re flagged instantly, hell even times where Miami didn’t set a pick
 
Dolph N.Fan said:
It absolutely pisses me off that New England Green Bay and Pittsburgh are always setting pick plays to get open and are never called for it. The few times Miami does they’re flagged instantly, hell even times where Miami didn’t set a pick
Click to expand...
“Times where Miami didn’t set a pick”


Was that earlier this year? Stills running his route and a defender runs into him and they called him on PI...? Might’ve been a different one but that one sticks out
 
jlfin said:
While I don’t believe games are fixed, I do believe the league wants to see certain favored teams do well and the officials tweak the games with their calls or non calls. The Pats and Steelers come to mind.
The missed tripping call was so obvious and egregious that there is no way the official standing there doesn’t see it.
It would have decided the game and that’s why no flag was thrown
Click to expand...
This. Funny thing - in the SB when’s Seattle lost to NE, the Hawks were driving in the 3rd already w the 10 point lead they had, when almost the same exact thing happened to them on a 3rd down. Man beaten, dove and tripped the WR who would have caught it and had a ton of daylight in front. It was such a bogus non call and I still believe it wasn’t called because the game was getting away from NE at that point and they want the SBs to be close. Such hoseshit - no way NE doesn’t get that call yesterday if other way around.
 
It’s hard to say there isn’t favoritism with teams, when the same teams are benefiting from bad calls week in and week out.
 
And why do players just let Brady loose as if they do not want to interrupt "The plan"


Few players are going to be kicking themselves more over a missed opportunity than Breeland Speaks. The Kansas City linebacker had Tom Brady wrapped up on a key 3rd-and-goal play from the four-yard line, but he let Brady go.

Brady then ran the ball in for a score to give the Pats a 37-33 lead.

There is speculation that Speaks let Brady go because he thought the quarterback had thrown a pass, and he wanted to avoid a roughing the passer penalty — he even appeared to roll on his side to avoid a body weight penalty. Had he stuck with the tackle and brought Brady down, the Patriots might have kicked a field goal to tie the game at 33. New England ended up winning 43-40 in a very close finish.
 
Good_Dylan said:
And why do players just let Brady loose as if they do not want to interrupt "The plan"


Few players are going to be kicking themselves more over a missed opportunity than Breeland Speaks. The Kansas City linebacker had Tom Brady wrapped up on a key 3rd-and-goal play from the four-yard line, but he let Brady go.

Brady then ran the ball in for a score to give the Pats a 37-33 lead.

There is speculation that Speaks let Brady go because he thought the quarterback had thrown a pass, and he wanted to avoid a roughing the passer penalty — he even appeared to roll on his side to avoid a body weight penalty. Had he stuck with the tackle and brought Brady down, the Patriots might have kicked a field goal to tie the game at 33. New England ended up winning 43-40 in a very close finish.
Click to expand...

Would not have mattered, they was a defensive holding penalty on chiefs anyway.
 
Oh what the tuck rule! The Cheats have been getting ALL the help necessary (from the league) to "influence" game outcomes for like 17 years! In fact the only area of the country that doesn't SEE the obvious is (you guessed it) Cheaterville! From spying to HGH to soft balls and *legalized holding for the Lady* to "just chuck the pig up high in the air sweetie and we'll call PI for you!" to resetting the clock if you need more time sweetie -- and it goes on and on you britches! Peeps forget when the booger eater connoisseur Kraft (not its real name) threatened to move the team to Hartford (OMG!) and wowser 911 patriot mania -- well the rest is cheaters history.

Really perverse thing is -- the cheaters fan base is SOOOOOOOOOO entitled and Pavlov's dog trained to EXPECT all the calls going their way they think their supposed "team" is a victim (LOL) if 1 call goes against them! Acting as if the "league" has it in for them whenever they get caught cheating!!!
 
AnthonySabaNFL said:
Hate starting with a negative this week (because this win was EPIC), but this "no call" by the refs is inexcusable, especially given that it's at the end of the game! This was INTENTIONAL by the linebacker! C'mon, man!

Click to expand...

I thought it looked like a Chicago bear collided with him and He was blocked into drake
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom