Tyreek Hill explains why he left Chiefs for Dolphins, says K.C. didn't utilize him, relationship 'fell apart'
Hill did not feel appreciated enough in Kansas City
www.cbssports.com
You can't really tell the media/fans you left for money. It's a bad look.I havenāt read the story yet. But if the headline is accurate in summarizing what happened then thats worrying. Watching KC games itās clear Hill was definitely a focal point of the offense.
That could be a concern. Hope he just wants the ball and isn't a selfish player.Hill was 7th in the NFL in targets (159). What the hell is he talking about when he says he's not getting utilized enough.
I hope this isn't a sign of things to come.
The Chiefs didn't have to trade him either.There are 120 million reasons why.
That could be a concern. Hope he just wants the ball and isn't a selfish player.
The Chiefs didn't have to trade him either.
Something soured with the team.
Hopefully not before 5 years with us.Brings up the frightening thought what happens if the offense/Qb doesnāt meet Hills expectations? Does he become a problem child?
Absolutely spot on, the two deep safeties deployed made it extremely difficult for KC to be explosive deep and I remember Tampa in SB, first to do it SMH and Brady got the win."The diminished big-play capacity was a byproduct of defenses catering to the Chiefs' deep-passing offense by playing two-high safeties and forcing quarterback Patrick Mahomes to operate underneath. In the short term, the approach gave the Chiefs fits. Given the club's offseason moves, the long-term effect may have been a reprioritization of its offensive attack, which left Kansas City unwilling to meet Hill's contract wishes."
Edit: This reminds me of what McD has said about how you work with the run game to get the single high safety look. The Chiefs never ran the ball that much to force teams to bring the safety up.