Canadi-Phin said:I agree with the thought about having stars at QB for a time and then RB. I just look at the best teams of the last 20 some years. San Fran had Montana, Rice, and even Craig, then it was Young, Watters, and Rice, then in Dallas you had Smith, Aikman, and Irvin. Denver had Elway, Smith, and Davis. Plus they all had great defenses in the years that they won. We had Marino and the Marks and no D and No runner. This hurt us because we were one dimensional. Then we had a great d and Ricky but no Qb. QB is the most important player on the field and that hurt us because when it came time to "get paid" Fieldler would screw it up. Defense can win with a efficient offense. Doesn't mean it has to be great but efficient we did not have a efficient offense, teams would stack the line and make fieldler beat them, this never could happen.
Marino was screw by his defenses over the years. The other team would put up so many points that he felt the pressure everytime he touched the field. "He was hurt by his own success", I agree but when your defense lets other teams, the Bills, score at will on you, what is he suppose to do? Pass up the 40 yard touchdown because his D is Tired. As much as they may have been tired from Marino leading quick drives, they also sucked. They gave up tons of big throws and running plays every game. I don't think they were on the field long enough to get tired. 3 plays and the other team had scored. Then Marino would come out and score as quickly as he could to even the score. he hated to trail.
That's what I think.
Couldn't have said it better myself.