So we create a hole on offense to attempt to fix a hole on defense? I don't understand the logic. If we get a new coach and draft a QB, Marshall will be fine. Who would we have start? Hartline?![]()
Now that is funny.....Seriously though trading Marshall away or any player for that matter should always be an option on the table at any point it will greatly enhance your team. However, with that option being exercised your banking on the people holding the cards to have done an appropriate evaluation of both talent going and new talent coming in or to use those extra draft picks accordingly during the draft....we have ZERO of that currently and before we even considered trading away anyone, we had best taken care of cleaning our house out first, starting at the top before handing over the keys to trade in the Ferrari for that Lamborghini, because their liable to return with a Volkswagon for ya!I'd take a second and a fourth, but I doubt anyone would offer much of anything for him.
Yup, lets trade the WR that has 100 yard receiving in 2 out of our 3 games this year. Brilliant...
This thread is ridiculous. Marshall is a top 10 receiver. You keep those kind of players. Not trade them.
There are at least 20 wr I would take before BM.
This thread is ridiculous. Marshall is a top 10 receiver. You keep those kind of players. Not trade them.
Name them...
Shouldn't be hard to replace him. My sister can drop TD passes. Does he all the sudden stop dropping TD passes once Luck is here?
I discount what he achieves on the field by what he does in the locker room and off the field. I think in a lot of ways he hurts team chemistry, and I'm not a big chemistry guy.
He finished 16th in yards and 61st in TDs last year and add in all the up and coming WRs he might not even be that high.