are you struggling to read, not absolving Mark of blame. he deserves his share. Just pointing out he barely had time to play and the O looked a heck of a lot better w/ him than it had most of the game w/ Bradford.
Who would have thought that MArk Sanchz would help lead Miami to a win lol
- Thread starter dlockz
- Start date
are you struggling to read, not absolving Mark of blame. he deserves his share. Just pointing out he barely had time to play and the O looked a heck of a lot better w/ him than it had most of the game w/ Bradford.
truedolfan57
Active Roster
what about the pass on 4th down, where he threw it to a guy 5yds behind the 1st down line with 2 guys on him? is that the WR's fault too?
Austin killed that team. couldn't get his feet in on that beautiful would be TD, stopped running and didn't try to catch the INT and didn't look for the ball on what would have been a big hitter on the last drive. I guess it is Mark's fault for expecting Austin to know what he is doing. Maybe w/ 1st team reps this week he doesn't trust him next week?
---------- Post added at 04:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:31 PM ----------
Can't defend it other than why are they running that route there?
Technically it could be. Why run the route short of the 1st down marker? What is this, Dolphins football?
QBR means nothing. for almost 3 qtrs Bradford couldn't move the offense, for most of the game Tannehill couldn't move his offense. Miami's D kept them in what should have been a blowout.
truedolfan57
Active Roster
well it seemed like a smart move by philly. he was double teamed. Sanchez should have been able to find a wide open guy past the sticks....but Sanchez gonna Sanchez.
I strongly disagree. He scores 3 points and he is better? He missed open guys. And idk what junc is talking about with the pass he threw behind the WR. You expect the WR to reach back accross his body AND run for big yardage
So Bradford couldn't move the offense despite the 14 pts they put on the board, yet I'm to believe Sanchez had the best game of the 3 QBs when he led them to 3 points? I never said Tannehill moved the offense. The TD to Landry is the sort of play that happens to Miami typically (the Favre TD pass in the opener with the Jets a few years back). Miami is not a good team. I will not change that opinion until they make the playoffs.
All that being said, Sanchez was still not the best QB yesterday.
---------- Post added at 04:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:38 PM ----------
Looking at the play again, there was an open man to Sanchez's left. Now he had pressure in his face so maybe he didn't have the time to get it over there but it is what it is.
truedolfan57
Active Roster
It doesn't matter. The QB has to make a play. (junc logic)
Which implies he didn't fail. But that's my fault i apologize for an interpretation of what you said.
Fact is Bradford got 16 points. Sanchez got 3.
I don't think he energized Murray unless energize means preventing him from being successful by tripping him
Terrific. Make the playoffs then. No excuses. No bitching about Miles Austin, no saying Sanchez only had 1 quarter to work with (nevermind he had 23 pass attempts to Bradford's 25).
He's the man. Go do it.
phishxhead
Ring Of Honor
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2005
- Messages
- 2,672
- Reaction score
- 61
There is no way anyone can strongly disagree because none of them played great.
We aren't talking about anyone playing great. We're talking about your opinion that Sanchez played the best. He didn't.
1. Sam Bradford sucks. Always has, always will. He's the ultimate "check down Charlie" and Chip Kelly should be committed for trading for the bum.
2. Mark Sanchez has more upside than Bradford. Bradford is just a robot. Always had been, always will be. He can complete 80% of his little passes but he'll never lead a team anywhere. I think Sanchez is a tool - but he's played in 2 Title games. Bradford will never lead a team to the playoffs.
3. Sanchez posed more of a threat to the Fins when he entered the game. By the time Sam I Am (not) left the game he was utterly impotent. I was upset that Sanchez was coming in because the threat of him making a big play would be there.
4. Sanchez doesn't start because of what we saw w the pick. He is erratic. He can look great and blow it all in the same game. Philly is Phucked without Pholes. They have a robotic ****bag at the QB spot, another guy who has more talent but is erratic at the backup spot.
5. Tannehill did not have a great game but he made more key plays (lucky or not) than the Eagle QBs
That's all I've got.
2. Mark Sanchez has more upside than Bradford. Bradford is just a robot. Always had been, always will be. He can complete 80% of his little passes but he'll never lead a team anywhere. I think Sanchez is a tool - but he's played in 2 Title games. Bradford will never lead a team to the playoffs.
3. Sanchez posed more of a threat to the Fins when he entered the game. By the time Sam I Am (not) left the game he was utterly impotent. I was upset that Sanchez was coming in because the threat of him making a big play would be there.
4. Sanchez doesn't start because of what we saw w the pick. He is erratic. He can look great and blow it all in the same game. Philly is Phucked without Pholes. They have a robotic ****bag at the QB spot, another guy who has more talent but is erratic at the backup spot.
5. Tannehill did not have a great game but he made more key plays (lucky or not) than the Eagle QBs
That's all I've got.