I can live with that.....or ParsonsTrade down from #6 if Pitts/Chase are gone and take Waddle at #9 or #10!
I can live with that.....or ParsonsTrade down from #6 if Pitts/Chase are gone and take Waddle at #9 or #10!
Beat me to it.It's definitely going to be interesting that's for sure, I also didn't see as much of Sewell as I did Slater. From what I seen I take Slater over Sewell, Slater absolutely faced more NFL ready talent. Hell his performance against Chase Young was quite impressive. But I don't like either at 6, now if we traded back with Denver at 9 I wouldn't be disappointed with Slater or Sewell, but I personally would rather have Parsons or Waddle if that was the case and they're still on the board.
100%..but we can trade down and get Parsons, too..no? Probably?Beat me to it.
I realize the risk with MP, but I also see the possibilities.
I have liked Waddle all along and I would not be upset at all if he is the Dolphins pick at 6. I am excited with that pick because the Dolphins have the opportunity to select a number of players who can come in and become an impact player immediately.By the way, I'm actually warming up to Waddle.
I can see him being very effective from the slot. Just don't know that I want a slot @6 either.
Luv ya Danny. If I owned a team, you can run my draft.......lol. We might not win, but it would be exciting offense.......
Depends how far down.100%..but we can trade down and get Parsons, too..no? Probably?
Some 'experts' say he could drop to us at #18 because of "character concerns" and being the ring-leader of a hazing incident, I believe, as a freshman in HS..so idk. We'll see!Depends how far down.
I don't see him dropping much past 10.
Maybe I'm putting too much emphasis on the #6 spot. It is, after all, "house money" at this point.I have liked Waddle all along and I would not be upset at all if he is the Dolphins pick at 6. I am excited with that pick because the Dolphins have the opportunity to select a number of players who can come in and become an impact player immediately.
I think Parsons is going to be really special, I know generational has been thrown around a lot this draft, and for argument's sake it's not out of the realm to think that Parsons could be the most "generational" talent in the draft. One thing that is for sure is that he is the best linebacker and it's not even close coming out of this draft. Of course it's always a crap shoot but I've not seen a linebacker that has been as pro ready as Parsons since Patrick Willis.Beat me to it.
I realize the risk with MP, but I also see the possibilities.
Yessir it is. I would love to trade down to like #7-#11 or so and pick up future assets if the guys we really want are gone.Maybe I'm putting too much emphasis on the #6 spot. It is, after all, "house money" at this point.
Keep in mind KC was missing both their starting OT's in the SB
Where does this come from? Lol I haven't heard a thing about omg a HS incident....Some 'experts' say he could drop to us at #18 because of "character concerns" and being the ring-leader of a hazing incident, I believe, as a freshman in HS..so idk. We'll see!
You can't compare losing your two starting OTs going into SB to developing rookies. Redicilous comparison in my eyes.
Nope. You made a redicilous comparison. Play it off all you want, it's not even remotely comparable.Reading is fundamental...try again!
My point is in support of OL play and building.
One great O-Lineman won't fix the whole line, either, though. And we just drafted THREE last year in the 1st, 2nd and 4th rounds..
That has been the narrative at times. I think it has been overblown to some degree.Some 'experts' say he could drop to us at #18 because of "character concerns" and being the ring-leader of a hazing incident, I believe, as a freshman in HS..so idk. We'll see!