Maybe not a total failure but it sure had very bad ending . Hopefully lesson learned !
When you have a 3 game lead in the division with 5 games to go and blow it, then get bounced out of the wild card round, I would hardly call that successful. More like an implosion!
There is, because injuries don't explain the collapse against Tennessee in the final three minutes, nor do they adequately explain how the team played well in the first halves but not in the second halves of its late-season games.The team at the start of the season was perfectly capable of making the Super Bowl. The roster of healthy, available players at the end of the season was not even close to a playoff caliber team. That’s it. We had guys signed off the street playing. We lost or had severely hobbled critical players all over the field. Every NFL team has injuries and lots of them - but not like this. There’s no real reason to go much deeper than that.
Maybe could still have been salvaged by an otherworldly QB performance or two, but Tua didn’t perform at his best to bail out the sinking ship, he had a couple of his poorer games of the year at the wrong time. He had a really good year overall, but didn’t have his A or even B+ game in his first crack at playoff or playoff like games - and he’s certainly not the first young QB that’s ever been true for. Often it’s part of the process, and in his case the rest of the team was decimated around him making it that much tougher.
But the crazy thing is, Flores was 19-14 his last 2 years and McDaniel is 20-16 (2 playoff losses).Yeah the Flores way produced much better results.
Not necessarily. I don't think there is a sufficient sample size of games to rule out that the difference in their records is due to random variation. It's just as possible that Flores and McDaniel are both inadequate head coaches for different reasons, and McDaniel offers a dramatically different stylistic approach but with no significant overall improvement over Flores. It's entirely possible they're both great coordinators and were promoted to their level of incompetence as head coaches.But the crazy thing is, Flores was 19-14 his last 2 years and McDaniel is 20-16 (2 playoff losses).
I get that we are far better off w McD but at the end of the day, in the regular season a MUCH better roster only netted one more win over 2 years than Flores (the scum) though we did get to the playoffs 2x - but that is more a function of how the cookie crumbled. We could have gotten in under Flores at 10-6 and 9-8 as many teams did / have done.
We need to do better than 9-8 and 11-6
Fair pointNot necessarily. I don't think there is a sufficient sample size of games to rule out that the difference in their records is due to random variation. It's just as possible that Flores and McDaniel are both inadequate head coaches for different reasons, and McDaniel offers a dramatically different stylistic approach but with no significant overall improvement over Flores. It's entirely possible they're both great coordinators and were promoted to their level of incompetence as head coaches.
Excellent article Ross wanted a coach to fix Tua...rebuild that which Flo almost destroyed single handedly. McDaniels did an excellent job of doing that but now we need "Mr. Rodgers" to become "Clint Eastwood "and I don't think McD has that ability.Miami Dolphins head coach Mike McDaniel has one glaring flaw that he will not correct
When it comes to coaching the Miami Dolphins, Mike McDaniel has plenty of flaws. He is inexperienced and some of his playcalling leaves a lot to be desired. Thaphinphanatic.com
It's an interesting balancing act. The best way to win games week to week in the NFL is via blitzkrieg offense. The typical opponent simply can't cope. They get stuck at 20 or 24 no matter what they do. You're already beyond that, with minimal effort and hardly the requirement of playing a perfect game.It might be a new era in terms of those things, but if the new era teams routinely get beat by the old era teams in the NFL, then the new era is a loser, and no team should strive for that approach.
As they say "a team takes on the personality of its coach." Mike McDaniel's non-serious personality permits a "fun and games" team culture exemplified by a circus-like atmosphere and rehearsed end zone celebrations. Add to that the in-season Hard Knocks production and you have a team revolving far too much around "entertaining" and not enough around driven seriousness. When such a team encounters teams serious and determined to make the playoffs late in the season, it'll simply find it too difficult to switch gears on the fly all the way from "fun and games" to "all business," and it'll be beaten by such teams.
This is why the team's late-season second-half performance was so staggeringly poor in comparison to its late-season first-half performance, and more generally the reason for the downfall of the season overall.
Imagine the scenario in which you're facing a tough team in a late-season game in which both teams are trying to make the playoffs and get the highest seed possible. You're down on the scoreboard at the half and your head coach -- who is generally a silly goofball -- gathers the team together to try to rally the troops with a speech to the team. I'm not sure it even matters how stern or forceful he gets at that moment -- his words may just ring hollow because he can't be taken seriously. And then how does that team take the field in the second half?Yup - I couldn’t agree more. Mike needs to realize he’s not a supporting coach anymore. He’s a head coach and he needs to adjust his style. Can’t be head coach and the funny man all the time. That self deprecating funny stuff all the time is not what people are looking for or need from a head leader - whether they realize it or not. Not expecting him to change his whole personality of course, but he needs to find a better balance. If I’m Mike, one of my biggest priorities is ensuring that the dolphins are not the funnest team in the league and all that BS