Tannenbombs
Club Member
Really?!?! As far as being better we'll have to wait and see as Matt Ryan is entering his 7th year, but as far as being a comparable QB... well let's take a look at their first two years for comparison.
............................G GS Comp Att Pct Yds Avg TD Int Sck SckY Rate
2013 Miami Dolphins 16 16 355 588 60.4 3,913 6.7 24 17 58 399 81.7
2012 Miami Dolphins 16 16 282 484 58.3 3,294 6.8 12 13 35 234 76.1
2009 Atlanta Falcons 14 14 263 451 58.3 2,916 6.5 22 14 19 92 80.9
2008 Atlanta Falcons 16 16 265 434 61.1 3,440 7.9 16 11 17 104 87.7
Matt Ryan obviously played with a better o-line. MR took a step back in his 2nd year while RT continued to progress behind the worst line in franchise history. Overall, pretty comparable. I'd say, Tannehill is right on track, if not possible on a better one.
Matt Ryan first 2 years: 84.3 QB Rating, 38 TDs, 25 INTs, 11 fumbles
Ryan Tannehill first 2 years: 78.9 QB Rating, 36 TDS, 30 INTs, 18 fumbles.
How is that better? It's comparable, but in no way are those better #s.
Also Tannehill played in 2 more games than Ryan in their second years.