Simply put, correct.Rpo is based off what the key tells you. If he sits you hand it off, if he commits to run you throw it. It's not hard. We haven't done much rpo. Alot of what we have done as of late is play action.
Correct. Tua excels in RPO and PA. If we had a decent OL coach and upgrade at RB the offense is much improved.Rpo is based off what the key tells you. If he sits you hand it off, if he commits to run you throw it. It's not hard. We haven't done much rpo. Alot of what we have done as of late is play action.
You don't like the concept in general? Or are you making a "funny"?
Tua runs RPO exceptionally. He is a pretty good decision maker in the moment. He was plenty fast as a Run threat in college, however in the NFL there are offensive tackles faster and quicker than Tua. He has yet to threaten a defense by runnng. Yes his best ability is Passing, but without a "threat" to run its more of a play action offense or PAO vice RPO.
Unless the defense parts like the Reed Sea, I really don't want Tua running.People will tell you the RPO doesn't rely on the QB running, and technically it doesn't, but it really does open up your options since technically any play in any playbook can result in a QB running.
RPO is not based on the running of the QB. Of course a running QB is another option but I don’t want to see Tua running. Durability is the question for him.Tua runs RPO exceptionally. He is a pretty good decision maker in the moment. He was plenty fast as a Run threat in college, however in the NFL there are offensive tackles faster and quicker than Tua. He has yet to threaten a defense by runnng. Yes his best ability is Passing, but without a "threat" to run its more of a play action offense or PAO vice RPO.
This premise of what RPO is based on, is NOT based on the NFL level.RPO is not based on the running of the QB. Of course a running QB is another option but I don’t want to see Tua running. Durability is the question for him.
No more scatbacks or speed RBs, Miami needs a Powerback that can take the 1st hit, and maybe 2nd, before going down.I agree. You need a RB the D is scared of. We don't possess that player. Could have had him with Harris but we were too smart for our own good.
You don't like the concept in general? Or are you making a "funny"?
RPO is not based on the running of the QB. Of course a running QB is another option but I don’t want to see Tua running. Durability is the question for him.
If we had Lamar Jackson we would need to use the RPO because he is more RB than QB. That is why Miami blitzed and zero blitzed him endlessly.Which is fine, but in my opinion that takes away 1/3 of the threat.
It really opens up passing lanes when the defense has to stay at home for the play action and be aware of the QB taking off.
If I had Lamar Jackson I'd run RPO all day knowing if he makes a bad choice or the pass is covered well he can take off.
If we had Lamar Jackson we would need to use the RPO because he is more RB than QB. That is why Miami blitzed and zero blitzed him endlessly.
Time and time again it has been proven that in the NFL your QB get hit, he becomes less effective and injured. This simplistic form of football really isn't all that different than the old Wishbone/Option/Single wing and dare I say T formation offenses of the past.
These offenses work in college, players are not as big/fast/old. In college a players stays for 2-3 years as a starter, thus it doesn't really matter if he takes a pounding...... by the time the injuries pile up he is gone.
Gimmick football works until defenses catch up or your QB is beaten to a pulp (see Robert Griffin). There are no shortcuts to sustainable offensive football, control the line of scrimmage, protect your QB are the fundamentals and until it becomes a two-hand touch game it always be.....