Disgustipate said:
No, it's not. Not when a team is running straight at you and suceeding, and you are ****ting the bed in coverage while doing it.
Uhh, the 2nd to last game, Cleveland?
So you will credit Thomas for making tackles and tackling 4 5 yards down the field but you won't credit Hendricks? That is lame.
The Phins have a career winning record without Thomas. 2 lossed without him came when Surtain missed a game as well.
In that game Hendricks had 18 tackles with 14 being solo.
Thomas had 18 tackles against Cleveland however only 9 were solo.
Thomas had 19 the year before buy only 12 were solo.
Thomas had 16 tackles in a game in 2002 with 11 solo.
So in the last 5 season Thomas has started over 50 games. He has had 3 15+ tackle games.
Hendricks starts 3 games in 3 years with Miami and records 18 in one of those 3.
Also, Zack in his 15+ tackle games needed help where as Hendricks made more solo tackles.
Now let's take a look at the time derrick Pope wa sin last year as starter.
We won 2 out of 4 games while he provided sacks, Forced fumbles, a TD,. oF OUT 2 LOSSES we lost by 3 to Denver and up till the 4th we were playing even with Buffalo.
You know when you look at the statistics and outcomes of the game, we dfidn't miss Zack at all.
So the history has shown that when you fill somebody in Zacks place they put up good numbers as well.
You cannot deny that. That is a fact.
You need to live with the fact that any LB'ER that is decent will thrive in the system we had.
Once again I proved how in crucial moments Zack Thomas failed or in big games he became obsolete.
In respect to the poster who mentioned the Atlanta Falcons game. I will say this, your memory serves you wrong my friend. First off, we should have never been in that positon. Thomas and the defense blew a 21-0 halftime lead so that is a horrible example first off. 2ndly, both times those were assisted tackles. One of them Vick got spun backwards and was moving lateral and Thomas finished him off. The 2nd Vick was already wrapped up and Thomas just finished him off. Niether one of those plays was he the hero. He would have been out of place and a step slow AGAIN had our DT'S not wrapped up and delayed Vick.
However, I will give him props for atleast being able to finish Vick off. He is hard to bring down. Thomas gets credit for that, but it wasn't his play that stopped Vick.