Cuzinfinny
Starter
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2004
- Messages
- 329
- Reaction score
- 2
so let me get this straight? Booker's on-field performance last year qualifies as "nothing"?
The job of a columnist is to form opinions based on both the known and the unknown.
I guess that according to your logic, we shouldn't discuss the draft since we know nothing about what the personnel folks are really thinking about the prospects and because they have not completed their evaluations in full.
Let me straighten this out for you.
Never said Booker performance was nothing. Actually from the little I saw of him I'm more excited at his possible potential. He was about the only giant spark at the end of a truly dismal season ( and our fair share of injured RB's.).And I and any sane fan would have been shocked if the staff didn't let him continue his progression in the NFL to truly see what his full potentials are.
But all of our RB at times showed talent and if these were the only players we had starting next season we definitely be centered on the Ground game.
But it's early and we haven't even picked up one new significant player yet so fantasize all you want but it's just a little more interesting when there is some level of logic involved.
I guess I'm old school and like columnist who bring some level of substance and reality to the table in making their judgements. But it looks like in todays world thats not necessary any more...to bad.
Now if he were to base the article on his rookie performance and not that those two tied statements told us anything, I'd give the guy some credibility.
Hey but if it works for you thats fine, everybody has a right to their own opinions no matter how inept others my think.....:rolleyes2: