Yeah, probably. All I'm saying is the window isn't closed in terms of convincing players his way is the best way.
I don't know what you mean by unequivocal ownership, but good coaches have their players' ear even when losing or having a couple of bad years. A coach can be fired and never lose the lockerroom.That window is ALWAYS open -- just have a couple of bad seasons, throw in some press "hot seat talk", and less than unequivocal ownership and you are there.
I don't know what you mean by unequivocal ownership, but good coaches have their players' ear even when losing or having a couple of bad years. A coach can be fired and never lose the lockerroom.
John Harbaugh has at times not faired well but his players, even when not talented, play hard. Marvin Lewis, John Fox, Jack Del Rio...heck even Dan Campbell got blown out but you knew he never lost them. They always played hard.
Adam Gase teams, though? They look no more ready or energized or PREPARED than any Philbin team or any number of lockerrooms that were lost to a coach that didn't seem to get it. Tell me you haven't questioned this team's desire with Gase.
When I watch John Fox teams, even when not talented, they always come to play. I can't say that for Gase. So, until he shows that his teams can be consistently prepared and play hard (like not going 3 quarters without a point, or giving up 3 consecutive touchdown drives, or starting a game down by 2 or 3 scores), then I'll just have to assume that he's one more disappointment away from total upheaval.
That window is ALWAYS open -- just have a couple of bad seasons, throw in some press "hot seat talk", and less than unequivocal ownership and you are there. Gase didn't loss the locker room and those last two games make it clear it wasn't even close. Coaches who have lost the team don't deliver back to back *** whoopings doing exactly what they have been coaching the past two seasons.
This was a team that lost their starting QB before game 1, replaced him with someone who can't string together 4 good quarters let alone 2 good games, has a backup QB that the locker room loves almost as much as apposing defensive coaches, doesn't have enough talent to survive how hard they got hit hard with all the other injuries, and had a couple of players who thought they knew better than anyone else.
I don't know what you mean by unequivocal ownership, but good coaches have their players' ear even when losing or having a couple of bad years. A coach can be fired and never lose the lockerroom.
John Harbaugh has at times not faired well but his players, even when not talented, play hard. Marvin Lewis, John Fox, Jack Del Rio...heck even Dan Campbell got blown out but you knew he never lost them. They always played hard.
Adam Gase teams, though? They look no more ready or energized or PREPARED than any Philbin team or any number of lockerrooms that were lost to a coach that didn't seem to get it. Tell me you haven't questioned this team's desire with Gase.
When I watch John Fox teams, even when not talented, they always come to play. I can't say that for Gase. So, until he shows that his teams can be consistently prepared and play hard (like not going 3 quarters without a point, or giving up 3 consecutive touchdown drives, or starting a game down by 2 or 3 scores), then I'll just have to assume that he's one more disappointment away from total upheaval.
Are you suggesting that the coaches I listed were never rookie head coaches and somehow were head coaches with long runs with a team right from birth?Most of your examples of the coaches you listed above all had pretty long runs with their teams and a coaching staff around them that they had long working relationships with.
So Philbin had full control and leadership of his teams, then.There is NO way in hell that a coach who was on the outs with even a small minority of the team could have pulled off the last two games. Period.
I don't know what you mean by unequivocal ownership, but good coaches have their players' ear even when losing or having a couple of bad years. A coach can be fired and never lose the lockerroom.
John Harbaugh has at times not faired well but his players, even when not talented, play hard. Marvin Lewis, John Fox, Jack Del Rio...heck even Dan Campbell got blown out but you knew he never lost them. They always played hard.
Adam Gase teams, though? They look no more ready or energized or PREPARED than any Philbin team or any number of lockerrooms that were lost to a coach that didn't seem to get it. Tell me you haven't questioned this team's desire with Gase.
When I watch John Fox teams, even when not talented, they always come to play. I can't say that for Gase. So, until he shows that his teams can be consistently prepared and play hard (like not going 3 quarters without a point, or giving up 3 consecutive touchdown drives, or starting a game down by 2 or 3 scores), then I'll just have to assume that he's one more disappointment away from total upheaval.
So Philbin had full control and leadership of his teams, then.
And Josh McDaniels was a fiery, great hire for the Broncos when he traded away all the outscasts for his guys, beat New England, smashed the Chargers and started 6-0. Got it.
Tunsil has actually been pretty good for awhile..
Parker is having a tough stretch but he was open for big plays on Monday night that Cutler didnt connect with.
So Philbin had full control and leadership of his teams, then.
And Josh McDaniels was a fiery, great hire for the Broncos when he traded away all the outscasts for his guys, beat New England, smashed the Chargers and started 6-0. Got it.
No, I'm making an argument that there is no evidence to suggest Gase is any better than any of his predecessors, or that the last 2 wins are hard proof that most players on the team would run through a wall for him. It's a better sign than getting beat up, but as I've mentioned several times, plenty of coaches have done this and been complete failures.So...what you're saying is you don't like Adam Gase. Okay.
Many people here disagree.
To what purpose is this post?You've only been a member here for about 3 weeks, and most of your posts have been anti-Gase. Makes one think that you only created the account to bash him.
No evidence? His direct predecessor took us to the playoffs 0 times. Gase, already once. That's pretty simple evidence.No, I'm making an argument that there is no evidence to suggest Gase is any better than any of his predecessors, or that the last 2 wins are hard proof that most players on the team would run through a wall for him. It's a better sign than getting beat up, but as I've mentioned several times, plenty of coaches have done this and been complete failures.