jzolnowski
Practice Squad
I am not saying we should draft a QB with the first pick I dont know if there are any worth it however, I would like to say something to everyone that says you do not need a Franchise QB to win a SB. If you look at the SB winner year after year there is always a great QB on the winning team. Now before you get your panties in a bunch and argue the last few years lets take a look at it.
NE- built there team around Bledsoe(passing) then Brady(franchise) comes in and takes a pathetic team and turns them into the closest thing to a dynasty weve seen in years. Take away Brady and the Pats would be garbage. People that argue that a RB is more important.....Antoine Smith need I say more.
TB- No QB, RB, WR, infact no offense at all. I guess teams should just bank on the fact that they can build one of the best Defenses in NFL history and if your going to argue their not look at there numbers, by the way I will say that Brad Johnson is not a bum, not franchise, but not a bum.
Bal- See above, everything I said there goes for Bal also. With the exception that Dilfer is a bum.
STL-1998=garbage, 1999=SB champions, the only big change=QB.... I think that speaks for itself
So basically people argue that because of 2 flukes (TB, BAL) in about 40 years, Franchise QBs are no longer the key factor. C'mon teams do not become SB winners or Dynasties without a Franchise QB. Other positiions are important obviously but you can work around it. Without the QB its impossible. I know people will argue this but history speaks for itself. There is not much to argue when 40 years back me up and TWO can possibly back you.
NE- built there team around Bledsoe(passing) then Brady(franchise) comes in and takes a pathetic team and turns them into the closest thing to a dynasty weve seen in years. Take away Brady and the Pats would be garbage. People that argue that a RB is more important.....Antoine Smith need I say more.
TB- No QB, RB, WR, infact no offense at all. I guess teams should just bank on the fact that they can build one of the best Defenses in NFL history and if your going to argue their not look at there numbers, by the way I will say that Brad Johnson is not a bum, not franchise, but not a bum.
Bal- See above, everything I said there goes for Bal also. With the exception that Dilfer is a bum.
STL-1998=garbage, 1999=SB champions, the only big change=QB.... I think that speaks for itself
So basically people argue that because of 2 flukes (TB, BAL) in about 40 years, Franchise QBs are no longer the key factor. C'mon teams do not become SB winners or Dynasties without a Franchise QB. Other positiions are important obviously but you can work around it. Without the QB its impossible. I know people will argue this but history speaks for itself. There is not much to argue when 40 years back me up and TWO can possibly back you.