FlyingElvis said:
Remember, the article was about depth, not starters. You have to go 6 or 7 deep on the depth chart. I don't believe the Pats were mentioned at the QB position. Which is fair, since they have nothing but potential after Brady.
The article wasn't just about depth though
"But the fact is, no one can touch the Pats in terms of quality and quantity in the "back end," *quote from the article*
In terms of quality? hmmm, lemme think about that
In terms of quantity? lets examine that too
The top four corners(the ones who see the field in a game) for each team are...
Surtain, madison, howard and poole
Law, T. Poole, T-Buck, *A. Samuels/Burris
*not sure who will start
The three DBs chosen by NE were chosen with the 95th pick, 113th pick, and the 233 pick of the draft.
IMO the starting four for the phins is superior to the pats, remember thats my opinion though i am sure most would agree, even pats fans. As for the three draft picks in the secondary, I would think it is premature to think that such low draft picks would make an impact.
As for the other members of the pats secondary. Je'Rod Cherry, S. Mayer and S. Farley combined last season for 7 tackles, no interceptions and no passes defended last season. Two are rookie free agents from last year and the other is a 31 year old(Cherry) who had no ineterceptions for his career, 9 passes defended in 9 years of experience.
Now I know that BB is a master at getting his players prepared, But all his depth in the secondary is completely unproven. I've mentioned every player on the pats secondary depth with no exceptions mind you. first and second year players who are rookie free agents and low round draft picks don't provide quality depth if they have never played in games consistantly, i don't care if your V. Lombardi(well maybe if you Lombardi, but no one else).
Miami's depth includes A. Edwards(former 1st round pick who has been injury plagued), Y, Bell who is challenging for a starting sopt, S. Wooden, A. roundtree, K. Banks, B. Sippio, C. Atkins, and four rookie free agents.
IMO this depth is at least as good as NE's depth and is definately more proven in games.
The whole article has been just another example of how the media gets off on the latest super bowl champ. This is not my opinion, this is just the truth. The media looked at the pats roster and said "Look they have alot of players in the secondary and most of them are rookies, NE can't do any wrong so sinse they have lots of players they must have the best and deepest secondary in the NFL." The article is one sided.
In all honesty can any of you Patriot fans even say your secondary is better than ours in terms of depth or quality? By the way i am not accepting the argument "We won the super bowl so we are the best." Come up with an argument based on facts, not broad generalizing statments.