You call it idoltry because it suits your arguement. Does not make it so.
As I said 16 tds 11 int 6 fumbles 87 rating quarterback a
14 tds 12 int 11 fumbles 80.3 rating quarterback b
Please tell me that quarterback b did a better job.
Also yes the Ravens went further but Flacco was pretty bad in the playoffs. He completed 44 percent of his passes with 1 td and 3 int with a qb rating of 50. I think if you look at what the Raven did in the playoff it had much more to do with thier defense then his subpar play in the playoffs. Im sure he had his sealegs by then. The Ravens wins had much more to do with the other team turning the ball over. Titans fumbled 5 times and lost 2 along with an interception and Miami's 4 interceptions and 2 fumbles 1 lost. So unless you think that Flacco had a better season than Pennington since he did take his team further Im sure you cannot use this to help your Flacco arguement. Ryan was much better against superbowl runnerup Arizona in thier game then Flacco was against superbowl champ Pitt.
last 5 games:
Ryan: 84.4 rating, 5ints, 1022 yds
Flacco: 83.9 rating, 4 ints, 975 yds
To ignore the distance Flacco had to travel to get to game 13 vs Ryan is pure idolatry, yes. Sure on the basis of 17 games, Ryan was better and deserved the accolades.. but last year no one performed better than Manny Ramirez once he got traded to the Dodgers. However, while he was the de facto MVP, his body of work just was not big enough. Ditto Flacco. So yes, I will concede that over the course of the season, Ryan was better, but over the last 1/3rd of the season and beyond, they were at the least, comparable.
I know you suffer from "lastworditis" so I'm probably (lol) done with this topic. Either way, you'll spin this ad nauseum to support your intractable position. I'll just catch up with you on the next Fins player bash-fest.