You have to compare the situations. You said it yourself, Romo ran for the goal line. Yes, it was still a good play by the defender, but Romo ran towards the defender while Sanchez was trying to run away from the defender. Dallas had the ball with 1 and goal on the 3 yard line up 7 points. All they had to do was run it 3 times, and at worst case they go up by 10. The Jets were lucky that Dallas chose to pass twice (on the 2 yard line), and that Romo made a run for the goal line rather than throwing it away or taking a sack.
The interception by Romo was a horrible decision, and a horrible throw. Please watch the play again. You can't force a QB to throw a ball to a guy that is clearly covered.
Romo threw it about 2 yards short of Bryant, and all Revis had to do was catch it
. It was thrown right at Revis. Very different from the int Lee got from Sanchez.
Even if you want to call both of those plays great plays by the Jets, they are still 7 points short of a win. They still needed the Cowboys to let a guy come through (right up the middle) to block a punt. It is very easy to explain. At the end of the day, the Jets still won. A win is still a win no matter how it came about. I just don't like when people can't see the difference of when a team wins a game and when the other team losses the game. There is a difference.