Gladsadmad
Active Roster
Bodzilla29 said:Anybody who calls a player or a move a bust before a single snap in PRE-SEASON is an idiot. I'm sorry.
Who said anyone's a bust? Did you read the whole thread?
Bodzilla29 said:Anybody who calls a player or a move a bust before a single snap in PRE-SEASON is an idiot. I'm sorry.
How do you figure Seattle gave up a 1st?inFINSible said:Thanks for pointing that out. You're right.
Seattle gave up more for Hasselbeck.
I guess what you meant to say was, "Since Seattle gave up a first round pick for an established player and that player wasn't any good for a FULL season then you're right inFINS, it is incredibly short sighted to label Feeley anything at this point, much less a mega-blunder."
To which I would reply, "Thank you."
The Packers because of that draft got a 1st rounder, 7 spots higher then the Seahawks. In a draft, to move up from the 17th to a top ten pick, you normally have to give alot, so in my opinion, the Seahawks gave up more for Hasselbeck, the the Dolphins did for Feeley.Dphins4me said:How do you figure Seattle gave up a 1st?
If Seattle would have given up a 1st round pick for Hasselbeck then I would have said that. Seattle did not give up a 1st round pick for Hasselbeck. They gave up a 3rd.
The trade was
To Seattle- Matt Hasselbeck & GB 1st round pick (No. 17)
To Green Bay-Seattle 1st Round pick (No. 10) & 3rd round pick
All Seattle gave up was a No. 3 and a swap of No. 1. Sorry but that swap does not equal giving up a No. 1 for Hasselbeck.
That's still more than what Miami gave up for Feeley, considering the move down 7 spots in the first round, and losing a 3rd in THAT years' draft.Dphins4me said:How do you figure Seattle gave up a 1st?
If Seattle would have given up a 1st round pick for Hasselbeck then I would have said that. Seattle did not give up a 1st round pick for Hasselbeck. They gave up a 3rd.
The trade was
To Seattle- Matt Hasselbeck & GB 1st round pick (No. 17)
To Green Bay-Seattle 1st Round pick (No. 10) & 3rd round pick
All Seattle gave up was a No. 3 and a swap of No. 1. Sorry but that swap does not equal giving up a No. 1 for Hasselbeck.
LIQUID24 said:The 7 spots that Seattle moved is equivalent to a 2nd rounder (according to the Draft Value Chart).
So in other words, Seattle gave up a 2nd AND a 3rd for Matt Hasselbeck ( a guy who was drafted in the 6th round and never started an NFL game)
Having said that, we made risky move by giving up a 2nd for Feeley.
But Seattle gave up more and it worked out for them,
Agreed, if he can't distance himself from Fiedler you have to seriously doubt his future. Suddenly trading a pick for Drew Henson seems to make much more long term sense.inFINSible said:I can't count how many times that has been said.
It's true but, nobody wants to believe it.
If he's not starting today then he must suck. :nono:
I'm pretty sure Seattle gave up a 1st round pick, we were offering one and they outbid us.LIQUID24 said:The 7 spots that Seattle moved is equivalent to a 2nd rounder (according to the Draft Value Chart).
So in other words, Seattle gave up a 2nd AND a 3rd for Matt Hasselbeck ( a guy who was drafted in the 6th round and never started an NFL game)
Having said that, we made risky move by giving up a 2nd for Feeley.
But Seattle gave up more and it worked out for them,
No. Seattle gave up a 3rd rounder AND moved down from 10th to 17th (traded spots with GB).BlueFin said:I'm pretty sure Seattle gave up a 1st round pick, we were offering one and they outbid us.
By the draft chart they did. By what they were targeting they were not. Seattle needed OL. They wanted Hutchinson. That is too high for a guard, so dropping down was nothing to them. They knew what was available and knew that the picks between 10 & 20 was same talent level in that draft. If you check at the actual players taken only Santana Moss has been a worthy pick.inFINSible said:That's still more than what Miami gave up for Feeley, considering the move down 7 spots in the first round, and losing a 3rd in THAT years' draft.
Did not know I was suppose to be figuring it out. Also I NEVER said he only played in 12 games. Stop skimming and try actually reading for once.inFINSible said:Did you ever figure out how somebody can be established yet only have played 12 games since HS?
By the draft value chart they did. However Seattle already owned the No. 9 pick and money & cap also played a role in them moving down. Seattle did not want two top ten picks, especially a guard which they were targeting.LIQUID24 said:The 7 spots that Seattle moved is equivalent to a 2nd rounder (according to the Draft Value Chart).
So in other words, Seattle gave up a 2nd AND a 3rd for Matt Hasselbeck ( a guy who was drafted in the 6th round and never started an NFL game)
Having said that, we made risky move by giving up a 2nd for Feeley.
But Seattle gave up more and it worked out for them,
GB got Bhawoh Jue-CB Penn StateMrClean said:Also, we gave up a 2nd NEXT year, which I think is considered the equivalent of a 3rd this year. So, compared to the Sea/GB trade for Hasselbeck, our trade for Feeley sounds even better.
To add insult to injury for GB, after moving up 7 spots, they draft a bust in Jamal Reynolds, while Sea after moving down, drafts probably the best guard since John Hannah in Steve Hutchinson.
I don't know who GB got with their extra 3rd, but I doubt if who ever it was combined with Reynolds is equal to Hasselbeck and Hutchinson.
While what you say is true in theory, its not when applied to the 2001 draft. The 2001 draft was a weak draft especially for mid 1st rounders.tay0365 said:The Packers because of that draft got a 1st rounder, 7 spots higher then the Seahawks. In a draft, to move up from the 17th to a top ten pick, you normally have to give alot, so in my opinion, the Seahawks gave up more for Hasselbeck, the the Dolphins did for Feeley.