Feeley will not play? Reason?FiN.in.RI said:I dont believe he will play against the Jags (dont quote me tho) but he definitely wont be starting..(quote me on that)
Feeley will not play? Reason?FiN.in.RI said:I dont believe he will play against the Jags (dont quote me tho) but he definitely wont be starting..(quote me on that)
Dphins4me said:There is a difference, would you say not? Again stop skimming and start reading before replying. You seem to have a problem with what people actually say with what you want them to have said. We have already had this problem once and once again you have been proven wrong.
No, there is not much of a difference. Not enough to change what you tried to say.
When you've been in the NFL for 3 years, then you are established. Just my opinion. You may see it differently and that is fine.
inFINSible said:So we can consider Mike Quinn established? How about Sage Rosenfels, Is he established too?
You have the right to be wrong. Something you should know all about.inFINSible said:I am glad I have your blessing to see it differently because, I certainly do.
It suppose to be. However come next years draft. Miami will be without a No. 2, not a No. 3.MrClean said:Also, we gave up a 2nd NEXT year, which I think is considered the equivalent of a 3rd this year.
Dphins4me said:No need to pretent. Seattle needed interior lineman in '01. Also you skimmed over the part that Seattle already owned the No. 9 pick and that money & cap also was a major modivation for them to move down.
Of course not, but it was a calculated gamble. How many guards have been taken in the top 18 in the past 10 years.
I'll save you some time. Two.
1995 Rueben Brown (No. 14)
1997 Chris Naeole (No. 10)
So out of 180 picks in the last 10 years only 2 have been guards.
So it was a gamble, but a informed one at that, plus knowing what the teams between the two positions needed. Only Tampa took a OL and that was a tackle.
In my opinion it does. Seattle knew all factors before making the trade. They knew who they wanted. They knew who was available. They still had a top 10 pick. They knew everything.
What does Miami know? Other than they traded a No. 2 pick. I'm sure they have a general idea about next years draft, but they do not know for sure since underclassman will change things.
Being established would mean that you have found your role and your limits and have settled into a secure position, no? That being the case, neither Feeley or Sage's eventual position or value has been established. Although in Quinns case you may be right, he is established as a third string QB, but that is something that you cannot say about Sage or AJ. Their final position or value has yet to be determined.Dphins4me said:Yes, Quinn was established. Established enough for teams to know about him and what his value is/was. Same with Sage.
When you have been around that long then teams know your ability.
That is why no other team was willing to offer up a No. 2 for him.
:buttkick:inFINSible said:C'mon baby let's do the twist.C'mon ba-aaaby lets do the twist....or are you doing the spin?? I get them confused sometimes. :confused:
I admitted in a blind situation they gave up more, based on the stupid draft value board (Which I think is overblown) However it was not a blind situation. Seattle knew the prospects and knew that the players that would be taken in those position were interchangeable in talent level.inFINSible said:The numbers say they gave up more, period.
Not sure since you came at me. I'm just expressing my position and how I back it up.inFINSible said:BTW, what does any of this have to do with labeling Feeley a major blunder at this point?
I do not think its shortsighted. I think when you trade a No. 2 for a veteran then that veteran should be able to start.inFINSible said:My original point was and still is that that is an extremely shortsighted analysis, lacking in crucial information.
I can understand what you are saying. I'm not sure I agree 100%, but I will say its something to consider.inFINSible said:Being established would mean that you have found your role and your limits and have settled into a secure position, no? That being the case, neither Feeley or Sage's eventual position or value has been established. Although in Quinns case you may be right, he is established as a third string QB, but that is something that you cannot say about Sage or AJ. Their final position or value has yet to be determined.
Before this slips into a juvenile blame game, I'm going to quit. Anybody who wishes can go back to page 1 and look for themselves to see who responded to who first.Dphins4me said::buttkick:
I admitted in a blind situation they gave up more, based on the stupid draft value board (Which I think is overblown) However it was not a blind situation. Seattle knew the prospects and knew that the players that would be taken in those position were interchangeable in talent level.
Why pay more when you can pay less?
Seattle knew all factors.
Not sure since you came at me. I'm just expressing my position and how I back it up.
I do not think its shortsighted. I think when you trade a No. 2 for a veteran then that veteran should be able to start.
Everyone wants to point out that Hasselbeck stuggled his first year. Which is true. However Seattle started him. They did not put him in a competition with Dilfer. They told him you are our Quarterback.
That tells me that they were confident in their decision to trade for him. Miami's actions tells me just the opposite.
I'll save them the time. I replied first, however my post was not attacking yours. I added a comment.inFINSible said:Before this slips into a juvenile blame game, I'm going to quit. Anybody who wishes can go back to page 1 and look for themselves to see who responded to who first.
Outside of an injury to JF, I do not believe Feeley will start.inFINSible said:If Feeley doesn't start against tennessee, you may have a point, until then my opinion is valid and I am sticking to it.
You added a disagreement, not a comment, and with our history together, whether it was an attack or not is extremely debatable.Dphins4me said:I'll save them the time. I replied first, however my post was not attacking yours. I added a comment.
You simply attacked mine and got smartarsed. Try replying to the comment without the attitude. Do they need to go back for that?
Outside of an injury to JF, I do not believe Feeley will start.
First off. I do not have a problem with you. I did not reply simply because you had posted it. For some reason you reply to me with attitude. From your very first reply to me, you have came at me like I kicked your dog or something.inFINSible said:You added a disagreement, not a comment, and with our history together, whether it was an attack or not is extremely debatable.
The job for QB is wide open at this point, according to Dave Wannstedt.
link
And being how that is already a step up from when Dave was saying that Jay is the starter going into camp, I feel it is a safe bet that AJ will start the season, rendering your entire argument moot.
If Feely was no.2 (behind Mcnabb) then they should've started him and put Detmer at no.2 and still hold the ball for the kicker against SF. Instead, Detmer started against SF. Got injured and Feely came in.Dphins4me said:This is why I question just who was the No. 2 guy. Action always speak louder than words and Reids actions went to Detmer, not Feeley.