16phinsrfast
Art Damage
As far as im concerned, at that time, Mark Sanchize was set up to take the next level. He had top tier defense with top 10 running game and good not great receivers. Mark tanked on his own will even when he was set up to succeed.
You have first and second year and a playoff primed Jets team and Mark regressed.
Ryans numbers for as bad as our offense is set to meet/surpass mark's 2nd season and your team was playoff ready. My point is Miami is no where near a playoff team and yours was and Mark couldn't grow. Analyst see Tannehill working with the best he can and giving them career highs this season. Thats hope that he can be better with better talent. Mark had the luxary of a great run game and great defense. Tannehill does not and plays slightly better.
Year | Team | G | GS | Passing | Rushing | Sacked | Fumbles | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Att | Comp | Pct | Yds | Y/A | TD | Int | Rtg | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | Sack | YdsL | Fum | FumL | ||||
2009 | NYJ | 15 | 15 | 364 | 196 | 53.8 | 2444 | 6.7 | 12 | 20 | 63.0 | 36 | 106 | 2.9 | 3 | 26 | 195 | 10 | 3 |
2010 | NYJ | 16 | 16 | 507 | 278 | 54.8 | 3291 | 6.5 | 17 | 13 | 75.3 | 30 | 105 | 3.5 | 3 | 27 | 171 | 9 | 1 |
You have first and second year and a playoff primed Jets team and Mark regressed.
Year | Team | G | Comp | Att | % | Yds | Y/G | Y/A | 300+ | TD | Int | Rush | Yds | Y/G | Avg | TD | 100+ | Lost |
2012 | MIA | 13 | 227 | 396 | 57.3 | 2709 | 208.4 | 6.8 | 1 | 8 | 12 | 32 | 110 | 8.5 | 3.4 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Ryans numbers for as bad as our offense is set to meet/surpass mark's 2nd season and your team was playoff ready. My point is Miami is no where near a playoff team and yours was and Mark couldn't grow. Analyst see Tannehill working with the best he can and giving them career highs this season. Thats hope that he can be better with better talent. Mark had the luxary of a great run game and great defense. Tannehill does not and plays slightly better.