- Joined
- Feb 29, 2008
- Messages
- 59,341
- Reaction score
- 155,352
Brother Fred. Let's move on please
The Tua-Purdy Similarities and Differences
- Thread starter fin007
- Start date
Reality says we are what we are , injuries crippled us but we still need a magical touch and hopefully Weaver and Crow will help out .. good luck with the draft
It was the
lions tho and one has to wonder about Campbell's playcalling with not going for the field goals
Purdy is a nice story. Last player picked to starting QB in the Superbowl......got to appreciate that.
As for comparison, they are fairly similar physically and neither are super athletic, although Purdy (144 yards and Tua had 74) does run a bit more. Tua has the edge in passing yards.
I think both are really good players
As for comparison, they are fairly similar physically and neither are super athletic, although Purdy (144 yards and Tua had 74) does run a bit more. Tua has the edge in passing yards.
I think both are really good players
BlueUndertow
Active Roster
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
- Messages
- 1,297
- Reaction score
- 1,785
Not taking anything away from Purdy as he's been impressive. SF had a healthier team and a better offensive line.
Purdy also had/used a lot more time being throwing the ball. Not sure if these are measured the same way (through November 2023 and through 16 games last year).
Purdy also had/used a lot more time being throwing the ball. Not sure if these are measured the same way (through November 2023 and through 16 games last year).
Attachments
Honeybadger08
Active Roster
That’s funny, this guys allowed to do this constantly on this message board to people who’s views he doesn’t agree with.
I find it equally funny how someone, presumably an administrator of this site (not saying it’s you), who didn’t like my original post about the Pro bowl Skills Challenge would go to such an extreme as to change my profile banner from a picture of a honeybadger to a pick of a heart with Tua in it because they didn’t like my post. That’s something a 2 year old would do.
ANUFan
Club Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2010
- Messages
- 27,824
- Reaction score
- 37,061
Nothing to do with the oline.
Pretty much. It’s seems obvious he’s been coached to get the ball out as quickly as possible even at the expense that a better play maybe available if he holds the ball a little longer.
Clearly this isn’t sustainable if the team wants to develop and grow offensively. Simply put the OL has to be better.
This. The one thing in Purdy’s game that stands out vs Tua is the ability to run when he needs to. He also protects the ball better
Remember when he used to run like in the Arizona game multiple times
Brock Purdy's Silver and Gold Carrage turns into a Pumpkin TOMORROW
RastaMan407
Scout Team
- Joined
- May 23, 2007
- Messages
- 1,155
- Reaction score
- 1,048
Miami scheme is designed for Tua to get the ball out of his hands quickly, this whole notion about him needing more time goes against the scheme that McDaniel installed, it’s the reason why we have a track star team. Tua is a Rhythm and Timing QB it’s what suits him best and as a fanbase we should know that by now going into year 5. Him holding the ball isn’t part of his skillset.
He was more fleet footed then. I’d like him to lose some mass and take off a bit more.
I hope so. But I think SF is the better all around team and they will win.
He’s in the same quadrant as Tua. A little more time to throw but a little less accurate. All things considered there isn’t much difference except he made better decisions. Was he like 31 TDs to 10 picks or something while Tua was 29:15 or so?
