ZolarZ_GoPhins
Starter
The BigEast and Pac-10 have no reason to have a Conf Champ Game since they play every team in their Conf. I don't like the game and think that the total of season play more accurately decides who should play in the BCS game then a Champ game. It is about money plain and simple. It hurts conferences when you don't send your best team to the BCS game. Look at both the ACC and SEC last year. LSU and Va Tech were the best teams in their Conf and got beat by a team that knew them well. The winners of the Champ game went on to lose BCS games. Just imagine if Colorado would have beat Texas in their Conf Champ game.
I don't like it and I hope the BigEast never goes to a Conf Champ game. Personally I would like to see the BigEast add one team then have 8 conf games and 4 nonconf. Let the total sum of the season decide the winner. I like playing every team in your conference every year.
Last I will leave you with this final thought.
The Conference Championship Games do not validate the Topdog in the conference when they beat a team they should beat in the Championship Game. What they do is give the Underdog a chance to win and make up for mistakes earlier in the year.
I don't like it and I hope the BigEast never goes to a Conf Champ game. Personally I would like to see the BigEast add one team then have 8 conf games and 4 nonconf. Let the total sum of the season decide the winner. I like playing every team in your conference every year.
Last I will leave you with this final thought.
The Conference Championship Games do not validate the Topdog in the conference when they beat a team they should beat in the Championship Game. What they do is give the Underdog a chance to win and make up for mistakes earlier in the year.