I saw a difference... They stopped scoring points!
they hadn't scored since the 1st qtr, Mark came in and they scored on 1st full possession.
I saw a difference... They stopped scoring points!
with multiple chances to score more points, but is the main reason they couldn't score in the 4th, with the INT in the endzone and not being able to get into FG range.
So many excuses for the QB. I find it hilarious that you can do that, but then blame other QB's for just not getting it done.
And we already know what Sanchez can do with a full game. He can lead a playoff team out of the playoffs, ie last season.
oh, so now lets blame the defense for sanchez, but not the defense for allowing over 32 points a game THE LAST SIX games of the year in miami
nowhere did I say you absolved them, but you put the majority blame on the QB....unless it's Sanchez. See the irony?
The benching of Nick Foles in St. Louis and Sam Bradford's health problems have framed the Rams/Eagles offseason deal as the ultimate lose-lose situation -- and if things don't change from here, that's fair. It's also now fair to ask if Philly might wind up being better off with Mark Sanchez in there, ugly as it might have looked down the stretch against Miami. And that's the question I asked one rival NFC exec this week, eliciting this answer: "If they just use the zone-read and run the ball, yes. Otherwise, he'll throw the ball to the other team in crucial situations."
From an NFL.com story about Sanchez playing for an injured Bradford:
LOL
From an NFL.com story about Sanchez playing for an injured Bradford:
LOL