Who would have thought that MArk Sanchz would help lead Miami to a win lol

[nyjunc]

some more scouts:

If, as expected, Eagles quarterback Sam Bradford misses Sunday's game against the Tampa Bay Bucs and even more time, the Eagles won't suffer much of a drop-off at the position with Mark Sanchez.

That's according to two highly-regarded scouts who know the Eagles personnel well.

"There's no drop-off,'' the first scout said. "They're very similar. They're the same guy, basically.

"Actually, Sanchez is the better athlete of the two. He can move better. He's not what you call a runner, but he gives you a threat to run in that offense. He can run. Defenses know Bradford isn't going to run.

http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/...e_a_drop-off_from_sam.html#incart_river_index

 

[DuderinoN703]

yes, b/c he has done that so many times throughout his career.

Philly is in a much better spot now than w/ Bradford. if marks started last week they easily win.

Philly should finish no worse than 9-7 with Sanchez then. Guy has no excuses to not win the division.

 

[DolfanISS]

This is a non Dolphins related thread, why is it in the main forum? 17 pages on Mark Sanchez, really????

I don't even know what we're arguing about. Sanchez, Bradford, Foles, what's the difference???? Mark could be the best or worst of those 3 who cares. Honestly he's probably the best. I never believed in Foles, I did think Bradford would flourish in Philly this year, wrong, Sanchez may just be better than both. But it's not by enough either way to warrant a 17 page thread IMHO.

 

[tay0365]

some more scouts:





http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/...e_a_drop-off_from_sam.html#incart_river_index

This is kind of true, there should be little drop-off, though the stats prove Bradford to be the better QB, both should be 2nd or third tier QBs, so there should be little that changes other then maybe more INTs and less accuracy.

..........................Att.....Comp.....Pct......Yds......Y/A.....TD....Int....Rtg
Mark Sanchez-...2,176....1,226...56.3..14,510...6.70....82.....80....74.1
Sam Bradford-...1,760....1,032...58.6..11,065....6.30....59.....38.... 79.3

 

[tay0365]

he only had a few possessions, you act like he played most of the game.

If he was as good as you thought...that is all he would have needed. but in the end, we were reminded who he was again...

Miami was in trouble, but old reliable came through...

Off the Field he came with that familiar look...

 

[lurking]

If he was as good as you thought...that is all he would have needed. but in the end, we were reminded who he was again...

Miami was in trouble, but old reliable came through...

Off the Field he came with that familiar look...

The last photo is a shot of him giving the signal, I choked again.

 

[royalshank]

The last photo is a shot of him giving the signal, I choked again.

the butt fumble play never gets old. It wouldn't have been that terrible if it wasn't returned for a TD.

 

[tay0365]

The last photo is a shot of him giving the signal, I choked again.

 

[DuderinoN703]

yes, b/c he has done that so many times throughout his career.

Philly is in a much better spot now than w/ Bradford. if marks started last week they easily win.

Philly is in a better spot with Sanchez? Don't tell Tampa Bay that.

 

[dlockz]

Philly is in a better spot with Sanchez? Don't tell Tampa Bay that.

Too damn funny

26 of 41 2 tds and 3int but im sure stats dont tell the proper story.
In 5 quarters he has put up about the same points as Bradford did in one.
To be honest though its Kelly and his putrid personnel decisions that has sunk Philly.
That and his horrible playcalling. Decided to go cheap on oline and thats what they got.
He has last years leading rusher averaging like 2 yards a carry worse and thinking his system is so good that he doesnt need talent at wr well he is no Bill Belichek.

 

[Ben Had]

Yesterdays game shows what he is. He needs a strong team to carry him.

1 to 1 TD to int...and he even screwed that up yesterday.

 

[nyjunc]

If he was as good as you thought...that is all he would have needed. but in the end, we were reminded who he was again...

Miami was in trouble, but old reliable came through...

Off the Field he came with that familiar look...

if Austin keeps running he has a TD

---------- Post added at 09:47 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:47 AM ----------

Philly is in a better spot with Sanchez? Don't tell Tampa Bay that.

it's mark's fault they allowed a 200 yd rusher and couldn't stop jameis Winston? he's supposed to play defense too?

 

[sm0kinfins]

if Austin keeps running he has a TD

---------- Post added at 09:47 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:47 AM ----------



it's mark's fault they allowed a 200 yd rusher and couldn't stop jameis Winston? he's supposed to play defense too?

Nobody said that. But it is Buttfumbles' fault they only scored 17 points. (Always on the QB, or so we're told repeatedly) A QB has to step up in those big moments. :up:

 

[Sons Of Shula]

it's mark's fault they allowed a 200 yd rusher and couldn't stop jameis Winston? he's supposed to play defense too?

Yep. A real QB throws his team on his back and carries them to victory. #QBwinz

 

[nyjunc]

Nobody said that. But it is Buttfumbles' fault they only scored 17 points. (Always on the QB, or so we're told repeatedly) A QB has to step up in those big moments. :up:

He didn't have any big moments to step up in. He brought them w/in a TD late 1st half and the D allows a TD to extend it to 14, then 1st drive of 2nd half D allows another TD and it's a 21 pt game. did Mark play well? I assume he did not but it's hard to win when you allow 230+ rush yds to a RB and almost 300 pass yds to the QB while allowing 45 pts. hard to blame mark but I am sure he could have done more to at least keep it closer.