Fin Thirteen
Club Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2010
- Messages
- 4,664
- Reaction score
- 1,073
I don't understand why the QB is so sacrosanct that you can't draft competition and a potential replacement if he doesn't work out. Why draft a guy who you already know isn't as good as the guy you have? That makes no sense. Shouldn't we draft a Bridgewater or a Manziel if we feel that there are risks that need mitigating and that we're getting the player at good value in the draft? I would. You can't find anything other than a backup in FA because - guess what - starter calibre QBs don't hit FA much.
This deification of the QB is becoming outdated and people are going to have to adjust a little. I can see the QB role being split up by an innovative NFL team in the near future. Even if that doesn't happen, spending high picks on more than one QB till you get it right isn't a bad idea, it's complete common sense. All you need is a secure HC and a secure GM, run by a savvy owner.
What? Oh.
This deification of the QB is becoming outdated and people are going to have to adjust a little. I can see the QB role being split up by an innovative NFL team in the near future. Even if that doesn't happen, spending high picks on more than one QB till you get it right isn't a bad idea, it's complete common sense. All you need is a secure HC and a secure GM, run by a savvy owner.
What? Oh.