Right now basically the FO has been riding on the notoriety of how awesome it was that they assembled so much draft capitol trading Tunsil and Iggy. So I think its entirely fair to gauge their success on whether trades that set the talent of the roster back several years (but were lauded for the draft capitol they returned) actually ended up resulting in bad players. If you trade a franchise LT and a DPOY caliber DB in his freaking second year, with four more years of team control, and you ultimately blew the picks you got in return, and your team ultimately is hampered by lack of a tackle? Massive, massive implications. The FO gambled and were cheered in the short term without knowing what players those draft picks would turn into.A fair assessment in general. Up until the front office. Here’s what I would suggest to you:
List all of the players drafted in 2019, 2020, & 2021, and see how many were good vs how many either are inconclusive or look to have been bad picks. Then tell me what grade you would give the Front office. If you still think it’s an F, then so be it, if you want to put Brown, IGGY, & Jackson as the sole picks to grade the FO on, then I would ask you what about the good players that were drafted during the same period?
Are you sure you would give the FO an “F” For their drafting?
And year, the Brown pick is fair ground too. Three years into a regime, and the best you can conjure at the RB position is a goal-line back you're now miscasting as a starter? You ignored a dozen easy chances to supply the team with a top caliber RB that fell into this team's lap like a gift, and you continued spending those picks on other players that didn't work, while guys you ignored are 1,000 yard backs? Yeah, again that's an indictment.