Yet Brady could not get many of those 300 games until an elite receiver by the name of Moss came aboard, or a TE by the name of Gronk stepped out there to help the team.
I never said Tannehill was as good, my point was that if Brady who is an all time top 10 QB has done the short pass to elite levels, how is Ryan now doing it, making him a average or bad QB?
So, if I discount his prime years and his best players, his numbers won't look as good? Interesting. I'll take out the Moss years, I guess, since he was a deep threat, more so than Gronk, who would really fit your dink and dunk concept more and I'm not going to sort out all the games Gronk missed. He still had 70 games out of 226 over 300 yards and 128 out of 226 over 250 yards. Drops his percentage of 300 yard games by 1% to 31%. 250 yards stays at 57%.
These comparisons to HoF QBs is beyond silly. You can cherry pick stats all you like, Tannehill isn't anywhere close to Rodgers, Brady, etc. He never will be. If you want to argue that he still deserves to be a starter in the league, fine, that's reasonable, but this stuff...