This is a very fiery debate, but in the end a it's a little bit pointless. I'm a Tua guy through and through (probably very hard to tell from my posts
), on my big board he's #1. However if you discount Burrow as some kind of one season wonder, you doing him a massive disservice. What he put together last year was a season for the ages, it was incredible watching him game by game be outstanding. We can talk all we want about Brady and the Offense, giving that coaching staff all the credit but you don't play virtually mistake free like Burrow did all because of scheme.
At the end of the day this is very much like going into a ice cream parlor and having to pick between your two favourite flavours. Neither side of this argument is wrong they are both exceptional choices, I hate the durability argument against Tua, because folks are just really fitting it into their own agenda, players get hurt all the time, Tua is as susceptible as anyone. Yes he needs to work on not always wanting to play hero ball and take the check down on occasion, but he's already acknowledged that and that is a great start. Personally I would love either in a fins uniform, the gap between these two and the rest of the pack is massive, I'm not sure folks realise how big it is and the media have tried to close it up during this draft process. That's why I think it's imperative that we come away from the draft with one of them. However if they truly do rate someone like Herbert or Love higher than Tua and feel they will fit the scheme they want to run better, then I for one will still support that guy until it becomes obvious they were wrong, then we are back on this coaching carousel we've been on since Don and Jimmy retired.