A.J. Talking on ESPN.com... | Page 2 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

A.J. Talking on ESPN.com...

rickeyrunsover said:
To you. By the chart a future 2 is equivalent to a current third. So a current 2 is equivalent to a future 1. You may not want to see it that way, but that is what the trade chart value says. The higher rd is the incentive to wait on compensation. But has that equivalency.

by the chart, by the chart......every team has a different chart....the one that's public says "This is not used by an NFL team"

you want to look at it by the chart, fine, but when there is 0 evidence that that is truly anybody's chart, a 2 is a 2.
 
Our #2 was Used by New England for....

Dave traded our #2 pick to New England for thier #3 so he could pull Wade Smith into our Misery...
#2 Corey Dillon
#2 T.Owens
#2 AJ Feeley.....
Which one looks way OUT of Place there???????
 
SkapePhin said:
How does that sound like he has given up? Jeez man.. You all have some blood thirst. It sounds to me like he know he sucked on Thursday and is taking responsibility for it.. Which is in striking contrast to Gus, who blamed his receivers "not being on the same page" for his poor play.

Good point.

LOL I don't see how anyone could have even read that he has given up out of the statements.

"Yeah I played bad, I need to do better and cut down the mistakes!"

Well boys it looks like he has given up. He admitted to bad play and he needs to get better. Might as well cut him because he has admitted defeat lol
 
not for nothing but this is why I think he's a cancer.It's like he has no drive to do well or compete.. Comments like this make me think he doesn't give a ****.. When players don't give a **** on a team it makes them cancers especially at arguably the most important position on the field.. The director of the offense..
 
Dudeman said:
by the chart, by the chart......every team has a different chart....the one that's public says "This is not used by an NFL team"

you want to look at it by the chart, fine, but when there is 0 evidence that that is truly anybody's chart, a 2 is a 2.


LOL you have no evidence that a value chart iisnt used. And no that doesnt mean that every team always uses that either. It is a guide not a bible. A 2 is a 2 is a 3. It is generally known that many teams will go one round better for futur considerations. That is giving a future second is teh added cost for having a team forego immediate compensation. So it is a 3rd plus 1 to teh second for payment in lieu of immediate compensation.

Why you arguing so much about a commonly known factor? Is it because a 3rd doesnt look as bad? I say it does, if AJ never makes teh field then it is a bad trade.
 
FiN.in.RI said:
not for nothing but this is why I think he's a cancer.It's like he has no drive to do well or compete.. Comments like this make me think he doesn't give a ****.. When players don't give a **** on a team it makes them cancers especially at arguably the most important position on the field.. The director of the offense..

So whats wrong with a player admitting his mistakes and saying he needs to play better?
 
Dudeman said:
but they didn't, you can look at it anyway you want, but a 2 is a two..........
When you ask teams to wait for their compensation then you have to pay interest for them waiting.

Its the same as with money. You borrow 100 bucks & pay it back a month later, then you will pay back more than 100 bucks.

AJ value at the time of the trade was around 3rd Rd value. I believe Miami did not want to give up a 3rd in the '03 draft got Philly to wait for the pick but it could have been Philly sticking to a price of a 2nd and Miami telling them the only way they pay the price of a 2nd is if Philly waited a year.

Either way.

The price of the second was AJ & a years wait.
 
Dudeman said:
yeah, except for the fact that that was against Tampa's #1, and Feeley miserable game was against ATL 2's and threes.....big difference

Ya it's so confusing why he had such a bad night. I mean playing with the no.1 offensive line and receiver and all. He should have crushed those number 2's and 3's. Oh wait....
I love how your logic only benefits the side you want to see. You want AJ to fail so you will quote stats and spew out personally biased, inaccurate rhetoric but completely ignore that similar arguments could be made about Gus or the message boards new poster boy "Sage"
 
SkapePhin said:
Honestly, Id rather have AJ than the cancer known as TO for a 2nd round pick. The Eagles are about to freefall, mark my words.
You must be smoking the same thing Ricky smokes cuz no way in hell can anybody take AJ Feeley over TO,that must be some good stuff bro.
 
FiN.in.RI said:
not for nothing but this is why I think he's a cancer.It's like he has no drive to do well or compete.. Comments like this make me think he doesn't give a ****.. When players don't give a **** on a team it makes them cancers especially at arguably the most important position on the field.. The director of the offense..


Sorry but this is teh type of comment that bugs me. You would rather eh made excuses? He admitted he played badly. That is part of ownership, accountability, he is holding himself up and knows he has to play better. Unlike Gus'omments where he basically says he has no part in a 9 for 25 and one foot from 2 ints.

Now that doesnt mean that AJ should start, it says he isnt giving up and realizes it is his play that hurt those chances.

I would rather have a qb admit he played bad then make excuses. Leave excuses for those that dont matter, like us.
 
FiN.in.RI said:
not for nothing but this is why I think he's a cancer.It's like he has no drive to do well or compete.. Comments like this make me think he doesn't give a ****.. When players don't give a **** on a team it makes them cancers especially at arguably the most important position on the field.. The director of the offense..
So does this mean with all the times Zach has said over his career that he did not play well, make him a cancer also? Some how in your hypocrisy I gonna guess "No"

AJ admitted he played a very poor game & his mistakes were too many. That is a stand up guy, not a cancer. A cancer would have blamed someone else for his poor play. AJ has never blamed anyone even last year when the OL play was perhaps the worst in NFL history.

I've already pointed out time & time again how you will make stuff up simply to provide your view with some substand. Be honest. Its one thing to not like AJ as a QB, its another to start calling him a cancer for not being the QB most want him to be.
 
AS I predicted after the Tampa Game, Gus is our starter.
 
rickeyrunsover said:
Sorry but this is teh type of comment that bugs me. You would rather eh made excuses? He admitted he played badly. That is part of ownership, accountability, he is holding himself up and knows he has to play better. Unlike Gus'omments where he basically says he has no part in a 9 for 25 and one foot from 2 ints.

Now that doesnt mean that AJ should start, it says he isnt giving up and realizes it is his play that hurt those chances.

I would rather have a qb admit he played bad then make excuses. Leave excuses for those that dont matter, like us.
He will spin anything to make it sound like AJ is a bad person to have on the team.

AJ played poorly & stood up and took the blame for his play, but yet he is a cancer for doing so.

I wonder what FIRI would have wanted AJ to say?
 
GRYPHONK said:
So whats wrong with a player admitting his mistakes and saying he needs to play better?

Nothing.

It's when you say the same damn thing after every-single-game that it gets like he's just saying it because "its the right thing to say".. He's obviously isn't doing anything about his mistakes otherwise we would see improvement. That's why, to me, it's like he could give 2 ****s..
 
Dphins4me said:

I wouldn't expect you to understand. It seems too complicated for you. What I am saying is beyond face value.. Look between the lines and beneath the surface.. You'll get it one day I guess.
 
Back
Top Bottom