A list of the current starting NFL QBs that Ryan Tannehill is ALREADY better than. | Page 21 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

A list of the current starting NFL QBs that Ryan Tannehill is ALREADY better than.

nyjunc said:
isn't it amazing how you don't include week 1 where sanchez threw 3 Tds w/ 1 INT(the DB was actually out of bounds so it should have been zero) and where Tannehill threw zero Tds and 3 INTs? Interesting how that works out.
Click to expand...

if you wanna compare our raw recruit with 19 college starts head to head vs your veteran in his 4th year starting with his 48th career game, then even by those standards Tannehill comes out superior. But if you do, please realize that you are conceding that a rookie 6 starts into his career is at worst presently on the same level as your beloved TacoBoy. Cause that's what you're doing

Oh and considering what your team, SF and NE put up against Buffalo, you of all trolls should appreciate how irrelevant game 1 was when it comes to "fantasy numbers"
 
oh now he is "raw", you know he had more college starts than Sanchez, right? you know Sanchez helped his team reach the title game as a rookie, right?

how come you don't discuss the advantage of playing in the same system and same coach he played for in college?

you do know Buf beat the cards in Arizona, right? and that was Tannehill's best game. You also know that Cincy lost to Cleveland this week, right? and you also know oak is 1-4, right?
 
nyjunc said:
oh now he is "raw", you know he had more college starts than Sanchez, right? you know Sanchez helped his team reach the title game as a rookie, right?

how come you don't discuss the advantage of playing in the same system and same coach he played for in college?

you do know Buf beat the cards in Arizona, right? and that was Tannehill's best game. You also know that Cincy lost to Cleveland this week, right? and you also know oak is 1-4, right?
Click to expand...

Colts beat the Packers. I guess the Jets are better than the Packers now!

Also pretty funny that you left the Rams game out of your stupid argument. Rams beat the Cardinals. Dolphins beat the Rams.

Hilarious how you can call yourself a "football fan" when you compare how different teams did against common opponents.
 
nyjunc said:
oh now he is "raw", you know he had more college starts than Sanchez, right? you know Sanchez helped his team reach the title game as a rookie, right?

how come you don't discuss the advantage of playing in the same system and same coach he played for in college?

you do know Buf beat the cards in Arizona, right? and that was Tannehill's best game. You also know that Cincy lost to Cleveland this week, right? and you also know oak is 1-4, right?
Click to expand...

Is that the Oakland team that beat the Steelers? The Team, that pretty much controlled your team at will?.....Sorry could not resist. :)
 
nyjunc said:
oh now he is "raw", you know he had more college starts than Sanchez, right? you know Sanchez helped his team reach the title game as a rookie, right?

how come you don't discuss the advantage of playing in the same system and same coach he played for in college?

you do know Buf beat the cards in Arizona, right? and that was Tannehill's best game. You also know that Cincy lost to Cleveland this week, right? and you also know oak is 1-4, right?
Click to expand...

To answer in order of your (rhetorical?) questions:

1. College is really only an estimate of the potential of a player. The "speed of the game" is drastically different. So the first point you attempt raise should be moot. It's how quickly can the player adapt to it all in the pros. Are you also insinuating that we are unable go to the title game?

2. Systems don't matter in this scenario. At some point, his job is to be proficient in the system he's given. So far, he's excelling in it.

3. You can't use the transitive property in sports. It just doesn't apply.
 
jeez louise!

NYJUNC......A master of spin......​

imagesqtbnANd9GcSfuOmahOQGFZru7dekd3HYmc-1.jpg
 
nyjunc said:
oh now he is "raw", you know he had more college starts than Sanchez, right? you know Sanchez helped his team reach the title game as a rookie, right?

how come you don't discuss the advantage of playing in the same system and same coach he played for in college?

you do know Buf beat the cards in Arizona, right? and that was Tannehill's best game. You also know that Cincy lost to Cleveland this week, right? and you also know oak is 1-4, right?
Click to expand...

I know Oakland a week after we pummeled them they beat the team that almost tripled your score. I also think if you wanna compare Tannehill to Sanchez, you should take into consideration that we're the best team you came out on top of and that over a 4 week stretch you scored 3 offensive TDs including suffering a humiliating shutout at home. So you think Tannehill and Sanchez are equally talented? And that's the equalizer over Grossman-Lite's 4th season just because Ryan was in the system before in college, then he's got a leg up on the experience of 50 pro games? Could you be any more homeristic?

Oh and as far as Sanchez starting less college games? I told you back then, and time has certainly confirmed it that Pete Carroll knew what he was talking about when saying Sanchez wasn't ready for the pros, and was probably diplomatically saying between the lines that not every USC system QB can transition successsfully into playing with the big boys.

Either way, it's pretty pathetic when you have difficulty comparing a 50 game seasoned pro QB against a 6 game raw rookie. We both know it here in the No Spin Zone

edit: beat the colts to break a 3TD in 4 game skid: big ****ing deal beating the No. 21 scoring offense and 27th scoring defense. Sanchez: 82yds with his longest pass of the day being 12 yds. Funny
 
nyjunc said:
oh now he is "raw", you know he had more college starts than Sanchez, right? you know Sanchez helped his team reach the title game as a rookie, right?

how come you don't discuss the advantage of playing in the same system and same coach he played for in college?

you do know Buf beat the cards in Arizona, right? and that was Tannehill's best game. You also know that Cincy lost to Cleveland this week, right? and you also know oak is 1-4, right?
Click to expand...

Sanchez was dreadful in his rookie reason. So much so, that this year he's good in comparison.

In '09, the Jets made the Playoffs in spite of Sanchez, not because of him.

The Jets had far and away the best defense in the NFL that year. They were 1st in both scoring and total defense.

Top defenses in '09:
Jets: 14.8 points allowed per game (236 points allowed, 1st in the NFL), 252.3 yards allowed per game (4,037 yards allowed, 1st in the NFL), 31 turnovers created (8th in the NFL)
Cowboys: 15.6 points allowed per game (250 points allowed, 2nd in the NFL), 315.9 yards allowed per game (5,054 yards allowed, 9th in the NFL), 21 turnovers created (tied for 27th in the NFL)
Ravens 16.3 points allowed per game (261 points allowed, 3rd in the NFL), 300.5 yards allowed per game (4,808 yards allowed, 3rd in the NFL), 32 turnovers created (7th in the NFL)
49ers: 17.6 points allowed per game (281 points allowed, 4th in the NFL), 326.4 yards allowed per game (5,222 yards allowed, 15th in the NFL), 33 turnovers created (tied for 5th in the NFL)
Packers: 18.6 points allowed per game (297 points allowed, 7th in the NFL), 284.4 yards allowed per game (4,551 yards allowed, 2nd in the NFL), 40 turnovers created (1st in the NFL)
Patriots: 17.8 points allowed per game (285 points allowed, 5th in the NFL), 320.2 yards allowed per game (5,123 yards allowed, 11th in the NFL), 28 turnovers created (tied for 12th in the NFL)

Of those teams, the Ravens and the Packers were the Jets' main competition for best defense.
Jets vs. Ravens: The Jets gave up 1.6 fewer points per game (25 total fewer points) and 48.2 fewer yards per game(771 yards) than the Ravens. The Ravens created 1 more turnover than the Jets (32 to 31).
Jets vs. Packers: The Jets gave up 3.8 fewer points per game and 32.1 fewer yards per game (61 total fewer points) (514 yards) than the Packers. The Packers, however, created 9 more turnovers than the Jets over the course of the season.

The Jets turned the ball over 30 times in '09 (22nd in the NFL). Just imagine how much better their defense would've been had Sanchez not turned it over 20 times (terrible, considering he only passed it 364 times his rookie season). Just to compare and contrast, Green Bay had the fewest turnovers in the NFL that year with 16; the Ravens were tied for 5th in the NFL with 22.

The Jets also had a top notch running game.

Top rushing attacks in '09:
Jets: 172.3 rushing yards per game (2,756 rushing yards, 1st in the NFL), 4.5 YPC (tied for 5th in the NFL), 21 rushing touchdowns (tied for 3rd in the NFL), 4 fumbles lost in 607 attempts (1 fumble lost every 151.8 carries)
Titans: 162 rushing yards per game (2,592 rushing yards, 2nd in the NFL), 5.2 YPC (1st in the NFL), 19 rushing touchdowns (tied for 6th in the NFL), 8 fumbles lost in 499 attempts (1 fumble lost every 62.4 carries)
Panthers:156.1 rushing yards per game (2,498 rushing yards, 3rd in the NFL), 4.8 YPC (tied for 2nd in the NFL), 18 rushing touchdowns (10th in the NFL), 6 fumbles lost in 525 attempts (1 fumble lost every 87.5 carries)
Cowboys: 131.4 rushing yards per game (2,103 rushing yards, 7th in the NFL), 4.8 YPC (tied for 2nd in the NFL), 14 rushing touchdowns (tied for 15th in the NFL), 3 fumbles lost in 436 attempts (1 fumble lost every 145.3 carries)
Dolphins: 139.4 rushing yards per game (2,231 rushing yards, 4th in the NFL), 4.4 YPC (10th in the NFL), 22 rushing touchdowns (tied for 1st in the NFL) 5 fumbles lost in 509 attempts (1 fumble lost every 101.8 carries)
Ravens: 137.5 rushing yards per game (2,200 rushing yards, 5th in the NFL), 4.7 YPC (4th in the NFL), 22 rushing touchdowns (tied for 1st in the NFL), 3 fumbles lost in 468 attempts (1 fumble lost every 156 carries)
Saints: 131.6 rushing yards per game (2,106 rushing yards, 6th in the NFL), 4.5 YPC (7th in the NFL), 21 rushing touchdowns (tied for 3rd in the NFL), 4 fumbles lost in 468 attempts (1 fumble lost every 117 carries)

So the Jets had one of the top 2-3 rushing attacks in the NFL to go along with the top defense in the NFL . . . a defense, I may add, that may be one of the top 2 or 3 defenses we've seen since '09. Implying that the Dolphins will have to match what the Jets did in '09 in order for Tannehill to be on the same track as Sanchez (or to be "as good as") is nothing short of lunacy. The Dolphins may never have a comparable running game that benefited Sanchez during his rookie season, and they almost certainly won't have a comparable defense. Tannehill may not be a top QB (yet), but he's doing an admirable job considering the marginal overall talent around him.
 
SSnowman said:
Colts beat the Packers. I guess the Jets are better than the Packers now!

Also pretty funny that you left the Rams game out of your stupid argument. Rams beat the Cardinals. Dolphins beat the Rams.

Hilarious how you can call yourself a "football fan" when you compare how different teams did against common opponents.
Click to expand...

what do those games have to do w/ anything? my comment was in direct response to your resident homer/excuse maker removing mark's best game of the year b/c it was against Buffalo.

SigmaOmega said:
To answer in order of your (rhetorical?) questions:

1. College is really only an estimate of the potential of a player. The "speed of the game" is drastically different. So the first point you attempt raise should be moot. It's how quickly can the player adapt to it all in the pros. Are you also insinuating that we are unable go to the title game?

2. Systems don't matter in this scenario. At some point, his job is to be proficient in the system he's given. So far, he's excelling in it.

3. You can't use the transitive property in sports. It just doesn't apply.
Click to expand...

of course he has a huge edge knowing the system inside and out having played in it under Sherman in College.

Vaark said:
I know Oakland a week after we pummeled them they beat the team that almost tripled your score. I also think if you wanna compare Tannehill to Sanchez, you should take into consideration that we're the best team you came out on top of and that over a 4 week stretch you scored 3 offensive TDs including suffering a humiliating shutout at home. So you think Tannehill and Sanchez are equally talented? And that's the equalizer over Grossman-Lite's 4th season just because Ryan was in the system before in college, then he's got a leg up on the experience of 50 pro games? Could you be any more homeristic?

Oh and as far as Sanchez starting less college games? I told you back then, and time has certainly confirmed it that Pete Carroll knew what he was talking about when saying Sanchez wasn't ready for the pros, and was probably diplomatically saying between the lines that not every USC system QB can transition successsfully into playing with the big boys.

Either way, it's pretty pathetic when you have difficulty comparing a 50 game seasoned pro QB against a 6 game raw rookie. We both know it here in the No Spin Zone

edit: beat the colts to break a 3TD in 4 game skid: big ****ing deal beating the No. 21 scoring offense and 27th scoring defense. Sanchez: 82yds with his longest pass of the day being 12 yds. Funny
Click to expand...

you are the one whining about Buffalo and removing mark's best game b/c you are nothing but an excuse maker.

mark Sanchez has been a starting QB in the NFL for 3 full seasons, in those 3 full seasons mark has 4 playoff wins
Pete Carroll has been an NFL HC for 6 full seasons, he has 2 playoff wins(both at home and he inherited a SB team in NE)

Pete Carroll wanted Sanchez back b/c he was being selfish and knew Mark was his best chance to win it all in 2009.

you guys are comparing, I am responding. Get back to me when Ryan wins 1 playoff game.

Breed said:
Sanchez was dreadful in his rookie reason. So much so, that this year he's good in comparison.

In '09, the Jets made the Playoffs in spite of Sanchez, not because of him.

The Jets had far and away the best defense in the NFL that year. They were 1st in both scoring and total defense.

Top defenses in '09:
Jets: 14.8 points allowed per game (236 points allowed, 1st in the NFL), 252.3 yards allowed per game (4,037 yards allowed, 1st in the NFL), 31 turnovers created (8th in the NFL)
Cowboys: 15.6 points allowed per game (250 points allowed, 2nd in the NFL), 315.9 yards allowed per game (5,054 yards allowed, 9th in the NFL), 21 turnovers created (tied for 27th in the NFL)
Ravens 16.3 points allowed per game (261 points allowed, 3rd in the NFL), 300.5 yards allowed per game (4,808 yards allowed, 3rd in the NFL), 32 turnovers created (7th in the NFL)
49ers: 17.6 points allowed per game (281 points allowed, 4th in the NFL), 326.4 yards allowed per game (5,222 yards allowed, 15th in the NFL), 33 turnovers created (tied for 5th in the NFL)
Packers: 18.6 points allowed per game (297 points allowed, 7th in the NFL), 284.4 yards allowed per game (4,551 yards allowed, 2nd in the NFL), 40 turnovers created (1st in the NFL)
Patriots: 17.8 points allowed per game (285 points allowed, 5th in the NFL), 320.2 yards allowed per game (5,123 yards allowed, 11th in the NFL), 28 turnovers created (tied for 12th in the NFL)

Of those teams, the Ravens and the Packers were the Jets' main competition for best defense.
Jets vs. Ravens: The Jets gave up 1.6 fewer points per game (25 total fewer points) and 48.2 fewer yards per game(771 yards) than the Ravens. The Ravens created 1 more turnover than the Jets (32 to 31).
Jets vs. Packers: The Jets gave up 3.8 fewer points per game and 32.1 fewer yards per game (61 total fewer points) (514 yards) than the Packers. The Packers, however, created 9 more turnovers than the Jets over the course of the season.

The Jets turned the ball over 30 times in '09 (22nd in the NFL). Just imagine how much better their defense would've been had Sanchez not turned it over 20 times (terrible, considering he only passed it 364 times his rookie season). Just to compare and contrast, Green Bay had the fewest turnovers in the NFL that year with 16; the Ravens were tied for 5th in the NFL with 22.

The Jets also had a top notch running game.

Top rushing attacks in '09:
Jets: 172.3 rushing yards per game (2,756 rushing yards, 1st in the NFL), 4.5 YPC (tied for 5th in the NFL), 21 rushing touchdowns (tied for 3rd in the NFL), 4 fumbles lost in 607 attempts (1 fumble lost every 151.8 carries)
Titans: 162 rushing yards per game (2,592 rushing yards, 2nd in the NFL), 5.2 YPC (1st in the NFL), 19 rushing touchdowns (tied for 6th in the NFL), 8 fumbles lost in 499 attempts (1 fumble lost every 62.4 carries)
Panthers:156.1 rushing yards per game (2,498 rushing yards, 3rd in the NFL), 4.8 YPC (tied for 2nd in the NFL), 18 rushing touchdowns (10th in the NFL), 6 fumbles lost in 525 attempts (1 fumble lost every 87.5 carries)
Cowboys: 131.4 rushing yards per game (2,103 rushing yards, 7th in the NFL), 4.8 YPC (tied for 2nd in the NFL), 14 rushing touchdowns (tied for 15th in the NFL), 3 fumbles lost in 436 attempts (1 fumble lost every 145.3 carries)
Dolphins: 139.4 rushing yards per game (2,231 rushing yards, 4th in the NFL), 4.4 YPC (10th in the NFL), 22 rushing touchdowns (tied for 1st in the NFL) 5 fumbles lost in 509 attempts (1 fumble lost every 101.8 carries)
Ravens: 137.5 rushing yards per game (2,200 rushing yards, 5th in the NFL), 4.7 YPC (4th in the NFL), 22 rushing touchdowns (tied for 1st in the NFL), 3 fumbles lost in 468 attempts (1 fumble lost every 156 carries)
Saints: 131.6 rushing yards per game (2,106 rushing yards, 6th in the NFL), 4.5 YPC (7th in the NFL), 21 rushing touchdowns (tied for 3rd in the NFL), 4 fumbles lost in 468 attempts (1 fumble lost every 117 carries)

So the Jets had one of the top 2-3 rushing attacks in the NFL to go along with the top defense in the NFL . . . a defense, I may add, that may be one of the top 2 or 3 defenses we've seen since '09. Implying that the Dolphins will have to match what the Jets did in '09 in order for Tannehill to be on the same track as Sanchez (or to be "as good as") is nothing short of lunacy. The Dolphins may never have a comparable running game that benefited Sanchez during his rookie season, and they almost certainly won't have a comparable defense. Tannehill may not be a top QB (yet), but he's doing an admirable job considering the marginal overall talent around him.
Click to expand...

That would be incorrect, he had 3-4 dreadful games that skewed his #s but he was far from dreadful and stepped up in january to help us make the title game.

far and away the best D statistically but they nblew numerous leads including a double digit lead in the AFC Championship game.
 
nyjunc said:
you are the one whining about Buffalo and removing mark's best game b/c you are nothing but an excuse maker.


mark Sanchez has been a starting QB in the NFL for 3 full seasons, in those 3 full seasons mark has 4 playoff wins
Pete Carroll has been an NFL HC for 6 full seasons, he has 2 playoff wins(both at home and he inherited a SB team in NE)


Pete Carroll wanted Sanchez back b/c he was being selfish and knew Mark was his best chance to win it all in 2009.


you guys are comparing, I am responding. Get back to me when Ryan wins 1 playoff game.
Click to expand...



It's ironic that of all the 3 jets boards, the least objective one is yours, TGG where even there many accuse you of being too much of a homer,,, yet here you are trying to argue the ridiculous and unarguable in the No Spin Zone . Go figure.


I know it sucks for you that your QB is the laughingstock of the league who likely couldn't even garner a 4th round trade pick and ours is earning rave revues. For once we have something to be excited about but in your typical OCD manner, like you always insert yourself unwelcomingly to diffuse or derail feel good fins threads, you are going out of your way to diminish a QB who makes Sanchez look like a Pop Warner reject. On one hand you make light of the 17 point victory over the Rams where Tannehill did exactly what was needed, and much of it under pressure to win, yet excuse the abysmal 17 points the jest scored vs SD in '09 as being "on the road" and still attributing the win, not to Shonn Greene breaking a 53yd run or the defense briinging an interception back to the 11 yard line, or the most accurate league kicker missing what Rivers set him up as 2 'CHIP SHOTS" from 36 and 40 not to mention a longer kick that this 93% accurate kicker also missed, but instead to a QB who completed 5 of 10 passes for less than 40 yards in the second half 12-23 with a 59QBR and 101 total yards... and with all of that having his team eke out a 3pt win when it should have gone 6points in the other direction. If that was Tannehill, you'd be dogging him and rightfully so.


I will give Sanchez 2 legit playoff wins so that's the standard by which we'll initially measure RT17 as I don't consider a 7-7-2 team which couldnt beat a dead Atlanta team at hime in game 14, recently had lost 6 out of 7 games, beat teams with a sub .400 cumulative winning percentage during the season and only was gifted into the playoffs because Cinci and Indy considered them meaningless games for which a win did nothing. Sorry, but the fact that Indy pulled its starters in game 15 while leading, overall its starters between game 15 and the bogus playoff game outscored the jest 45-27 including 24-zero in the last 31 minutes with 2 of their three best defensive starters either being out or hobbled doesn't validate being in a post season. Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I believe you have to earn something for it to count, not be given such an egregious gift that the league immediately changes their late season scheduling policies so that won't happen again.


Pete Carroll knew what he was talking about. And at least his all PO appearances were legitimately earned and not free rides that were undeserved based on a bad regular season! If you think he'd trade Wilson for even Sanchez and a 3rd you're delusional.


With Sanchez the Buffalo game with good reason was an abberation.. but then again Tannehill's first game ever vs Houston was also. Only difference is one got better and the other quickly descended to his natural level of ineptitude.

When 3 teams in 5 games score over 40 vs Buffalo, those accomplishments become "fantasy numbers" cause it's on Buffalo, not on its opponents. You love to ignore that Tannehill played his first game ever in Houston, faced the same JJ Watt that you claim was responsible for 14 pt turnover in the jests game and also Cushing, who was taken out by one of your dirty players so Sanchez didn't even have to face him and still with all the film managed 1 offensive TD at home. Do you know how hard it is to manage 1 TD at home or be shut out by a WC team at home? Does that say more about the jest suckage or about Sanchez's? You loved to play the 2 TD 6Int Tannehill BS in that vacuum.. well we have a QB who actually improves game to game, is smarter enough to learn, doesn't get rattled when the opponents are up in his head or sulk on the sidelines dejectedly. You wanna penalize a raw rookie for his first game ever, then it';s only fair to point out that what Sanchez did in Buffalo was not unusual considering SF and NE's trouncing of them... mere fantasy numbers when 3 and 4 weeks later 2 teams averaged 49 pts against them.


Oh and knowing what I know about what goes on behind the scenes (do you really think anyone respects you here?) you complaining about other people "whining' is as disingenuous as Landry, Slausson and your guido sideline coaches complaining about dirty play.
 
Vaark said:
It's ironic that of all the 3 jets boards, the least objective one is yours, TGG where even there many accuse you of being too much of a homer,,, yet here you are trying to argue the ridiculous and unarguable in the No Spin Zone . Go figure.


I know it sucks for you that your QB is the laughingstock of the league who likely couldn't even garner a 4th round trade pick and ours is earning rave revues. For once we have something to be excited about but in your typical OCD manner, like you always insert yourself unwelcomingly to diffuse or derail feel good fins threads, you are going out of your way to diminish a QB who makes Sanchez look like a Pop Warner reject. On one hand you make light of the 17 point victory over the Rams where Tannehill did exactly what was needed, and much of it under pressure to win, yet excuse the abysmal 17 points the jest scored vs SD in '09 as being "on the road" and still attributing the win, not to Shonn Greene breaking a 53yd run or the defense briinging an interception back to the 11 yard line, or the most accurate league kicker missing what Rivers set him up as 2 'CHIP SHOTS" from 36 and 40 not to mention a longer kick that this 93% accurate kicker also missed, but instead to a QB who completed 5 of 10 passes for less than 40 yards in the second half 12-23 with a 59QBR and 101 total yards... and with all of that having his team eke out a 3pt win when it should have gone 6points in the other direction. If that was Tannehill, you'd be dogging him and rightfully so.


I will give Sanchez 2 legit playoff wins so that's the standard by which we'll initially measure RT17 as I don't consider a 7-7-2 team which couldnt beat a dead Atlanta team at hime in game 14, recently had lost 6 out of 7 games, beat teams with a sub .400 cumulative winning percentage during the season and only was gifted into the playoffs because Cinci and Indy considered them meaningless games for which a win did nothing. Sorry, but the fact that Indy pulled its starters in game 15 while leading, overall its starters between game 15 and the bogus playoff game outscored the jest 45-27 including 24-zero in the last 31 minutes with 2 of their three best defensive starters either being out or hobbled doesn't validate being in a post season. Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I believe you have to earn something for it to count, not be given such an egregious gift that the league immediately changes their late season scheduling policies so that won't happen again.


Pete Carroll knew what he was talking about. And at least his all PO appearances were legitimately earned and not free rides that were undeserved based on a bad regular season! If you think he'd trade Wilson for even Sanchez and a 3rd you're delusional.


With Sanchez the Buffalo game with good reason was an abberation.. but then again Tannehill's first game ever vs Houston was also. Only difference is one got better and the other quickly descended to his natural level of ineptitude.

When 3 teams in 5 games score over 40 vs Buffalo, those accomplishments become "fantasy numbers" cause it's on Buffalo, not on its opponents. You love to ignore that Tannehill played his first game ever in Houston, faced the same JJ Watt that you claim was responsible for 14 pt turnover in the jests game and also Cushing, who was taken out by one of your dirty players so Sanchez didn't even have to face him and still with all the film managed 1 offensive TD at home. Do you know how hard it is to manage 1 TD at home or be shut out by a WC team at home? Does that say more about the jest suckage or about Sanchez's? You loved to play the 2 TD 6Int Tannehill BS in that vacuum.. well we have a QB who actually improves game to game, is smarter enough to learn, doesn't get rattled when the opponents are up in his head or sulk on the sidelines dejectedly. You wanna penalize a raw rookie for his first game ever, then it';s only fair to point out that what Sanchez did in Buffalo was not unusual considering SF and NE's trouncing of them... mere fantasy numbers when 3 and 4 weeks later 2 teams averaged 49 pts against them.


Oh and knowing what I know about what goes on behind the scenes (do you really think anyone respects you here?) you complaining about other people "whining' is as disingenuous as Landry, Slausson and your guido sideline coaches complaining about dirty play.
Click to expand...

what type of boards I post at have no bearing on how i post. I give my honest, educated opinions regardless where I am. Whether a board is a homer board or not it doesn't matter.

I know, my QB sucks, my team sucks, we onyl win b/c of missed FGs but when your opponent misses FGs it's b/c of your great FG D, you gave us our game, you should be 5-1, we need to remove Buf from our evaluation b/c they suck even though they beat the same Ari team you couldn't beat in the same building, blah, blah, blah.
 
nyjunc said:
oh now he is "raw", you know he had more college starts than Sanchez, right? you know Sanchez helped his team reach the title game as a rookie, right?

how come you don't discuss the advantage of playing in the same system and same coach he played for in college?

you do know Buf beat the cards in Arizona, right? and that was Tannehill's best game. You also know that Cincy lost to Cleveland this week, right? and you also know oak is 1-4, right?
Click to expand...

Do you realize that T-hill is succeeding under more pressure and an eight man during his first six games? Do you realize everyone in the league recognizes that T-hill plays better each week? That cannot continue. If he did, he would be one of the top 5 by the end of the season. THAT WILL NOT HAPPEN! T-hill will eventually backslide. I cannot remember a single point in Sanchez's career where he consistently improved each week!!
 
FinHopeful said:
Do you realize that T-hill is succeeding under more pressure and an eight man during his first six games? Do you realize everyone in the league recognizes that T-hill plays better each week? That cannot continue. If he did, he would be one of the top 5 by the end of the season. THAT WILL NOT HAPPEN! T-hill will eventually backslide. I cannot remember a single point in Sanchez's career where he consistently improved each week!!
Click to expand...

I have never bashed him, I am just not annointing him yet. He has impressed me w/o a doubt and I have said that over and over. I'm just not calling him a top QB in this lague after 6 games.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom