Blake the great
Active Roster
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2011
- Messages
- 5,050
- Reaction score
- 5,803
Yet people want to dump him over someone like Grant.
Not I. I won't then both dumped. Wilson is old now and we have waddle.
Yet people want to dump him over someone like Grant.
28?Not I. I won't then both dumped. Wilson is old now and we have waddle.
Yeah, that's not in there. And I am also skeptical Albert is the type of guy that would make that remark when he's still on the roster bubble.In the OP it was stated "Wilson says he going to be targeted more than people think".
I didn't see any reference to that. I guess I will just assume that never actually occurred.
The whole reason I asked, was because AW has never struck me as someone who would make such a remark.
Personally, I think he would be a valuable piece here, and that he is easily at least the #4 receiver, in terms of talent (speed/hands/route running).
Something ironic in correcting a error with another error.......lol.This is too funny
I love this side tangente
They've kept Albert Wilson around for 2 seasons, for a reason. They apparently like him?
im one of these people, wilson opted out while grant showed up to work everyday and went to battle with his teammatesYet people want to dump him over someone like Grant.
Im not sure that is really a valid assumption, considering the timeline of the facts.They've kept Albert Wilson around for 2 seasons, for a reason. They apparently like him?
But if he isn't the better player, you are doing a disservice to your team over an irrational bias.im one of these people, wilson opted out while grant showed up to work everyday and went to battle with his teammates
That's a whole COVID argument I'm not getting into.im one of these people, wilson opted out while grant showed up to work everyday and went to battle with his teammates
grants stuck around for a reason, hes a hard working scrappy team first guy who provides good return skills, he should be the last receiver on the roster, not catching 60-80 balls a year...But if he isn't the better player, you are doing a disservice to your team over an irrational bias.
You may dispute the use of the word "irrational", but in the end, keeping a lesser player over a better one for "feelz" is not good policy.
If Grant were widely viewed as a team leader, or something along those lines, it might be a different thing, assuming the talent is close (which it isn't).
Your judgement seems to be that opting out = character flaw. Is that the case?
I guess we are going to have to disagree about the gap between them as receivers.grants stuck around for a reason, hes a hard working scrappy team first guy who provides good return skills, he should be the last receiver on the roster, not catching 60-80 balls a year...
my point about the opting out is one player wanted to go to battle with his teammates and the other took a year long vacation
wilson isnt significantly better than grant and hes injury prone, so i stick with the guy who had the heart and balls to suit up
im not all for grant either so dont get me wrong, im ok if we move on but if its between wilson and grant im sticking with the grant on his heart and return ability over wilson who was too scared to go to work and will only catch 20 balls and probably get hurt again anyway