True, but you can ascertain what the most likely outcome is in someone based on past examples. He started 13 games for us this year. I think he only finished 10 of them.
I understand the other aspects he brings but we, nor anyone else, should be paying that kind of money for half year availability...
It’s ok though because some fans think cutting him after 2024 and only paying him $13M is standard operating procedure across the league. /s
Titles by the Rams and Bucs have tricked people into thinking the “all-in” philosophy is the way to best secure one title. That’s nonsense.
Rams had been to a Super Bowl already in recent years and the Bucs only went all-in after they won their title. Neither situation ended well.
What were doing is more following the model of the Bills and Eagles. The Eagles with a staggering $54M in dead money this year (and more lined up for the future) can barely afford to sign their slated rookies. And haven’t even signed Hurts. Eagles are about to lose a significant portion of their roster as a result.
Bills similarly are going to lose good players this year (not that they had that many anyway).
Last edited: