ch19079 said:
in general you would be corrrect, but that does not apply to this situation.
befor his knee injury people were talking like he would be the #1 overall pick, or atleast a definate top 5 if not top 3 pick.
after his injury, people wondered if he would even play again. and he would have to sit out a year. that droped his stock drasticaly.
Brown is a very good RB, but there was still a question whether he was even the best RB in the draft. and his #2 overall selection is based on the team needs of the top teams, as well as tallent of the other top players.
but say willis did not blow out his knee, and came out of college this year, with brown, benson, and williams.
i would bet money willis would be taken before any of the others. im not saying they suck, im just saying willis was better in college.
Losman7 said:
You can't really compare them. I think McGahee would have been the first player taken overall in this draft if he had been healthy.
He was a projected top 3 pick the year he came out and I'm pretty sure, after Carson Palmer, he would have went #2.
Just because this draft was deeper at RB overall dosen't mean it had a higher ceiling.
That being said, Ronnie Brown reminds me of Thurman Thomas. He has the ability to split out, run, catch the screen.
Ronnie is bigger and a little less alusive, but that kind of versitility is what made Thomas and the Bills so dangerous in the 90's.
See with Brown and McMichael you don't need to change personel to go from a single back to a 4 wide causeing mismatches downfield. Ronnie going from RB to slot WR is scary.
I respect both of your opinions on this as you adressed your reasoning throughly and have good points.
Its always hard so say that one is better than the other in college because they have different teams to play, different schemes to run against, different supporting casts.
Especially in this case because Brown was not the feature RB as he was more of a team guy who did a little bit of everything, and his stats show that as they were not remarkable. Willis was the feature back and his statistics reflected on that.
Pros Brown
Versitile
Bigger, but still has the speed
Can run through you or around you with finesse, speed, and power
Great Blocker
Great Catcher
Team Player
Healthy
Willis McGahee Pros-
Speedy
Quick
Shifty
Great Vision
Follows the hole/blockers well
Proven the capability to carry the load
Brown Cons
Questionable if he can carry the load throughout the season and be the feature back.
McGahee Cons
Injuries. Very unstable knee, that was one nasty twist.
With that being said Brown would probably be a better power runner, blocker and reciever. McGahee would be the better shifty more elusive back. That leaves Brown with the better blocking and recieving skills without health issues, so I'd pick Brown (and no not because he is a Fin:) ).
Also before my head is bitten off I do think that Brown can carry the load with less miles on him and the ability to stay healthy and with him being used as a blocker sometimes he still knows how to take hits. Also who knows, Ricky might be able to help him with some ball carries:eek: .