standards
so hard not to take the bait isnt it lolLike clockwork, almost the absolute wrong take in almost every instance.
It's uncanny.
And this is what one of Michael Scott's employees would have said
5-10, anything under 200, quick
5-11, 195 +/-3% (190-200), quick
6-0, 205 +/-3% (200-210), quick
6-1, 215 +/-3% (210-220), quick
6-2, 225 +/-3% (220-230) slow receiver, possession
6-3. over 220, slow receiver, possession
5-10, anything under 200, quick
5-11, 195 +/-3% (190-200), quick
6-0, 205 +/-3% (200-210), quick
6-1, 215 +/-3% (210-220), quick
6-2, 225 +/-3% (220-230) slow receiver, possession
6-3. over 220, slow receiver, possession
It was amusing a few times, but got boring very quickly. When I laugh at something my 5 year-old does she insists on doing it 100 times but of course is not going to get the same reaction. Same thing here.Am I the only one here that enjoys Largo? I love that he is the scapegoat now for everything. Some times he even makes good points. I have even agreed with him on at least one ocassion... Not this one though. I think standards are meant to be broken. Desecrated by an anomaly, in this case an alpha athlete 6'2 quick reciever. Tell me Randy Moss' tall *** wasnt fast?
Hey is Carroo still on the squad?
Oh snap, that explains why Julio is such a slow possesion receiver.
Exactly. This thread is so stupid.
Julio 6-3, 220
AJ Green 6-4, 207
DeAndre Hopkins 6-1, 214
Kenan Allen 6-2, 211
DeVante Adams 6-1, 216
Should I keep going?
All of those receivers seem to be doing just fine without falling into your rigid standards
Just ran a correlation plot in python, and surprisingly(lol), height and weight are only correlated with each other, not even slightly with any kind of production whatsoever...No. That's enough sample size.
Julio, DeAndre and Davante are standards.
Kennan and AJ are not standard, and you do not draft them. As simple as that. Just scratch them off the board.