I agree. I would like to keep Ricky, but we should use him the same way in 2006 as we did in 2005. Splitting carries last year between Ronnie and Ricky was great!DolphinDevil28 said:I'm glad we're keeping Ricky, but the "featured" back???
Man, Ronnie's too damn good for that.
Why can't Mort see him as "A" feature back, along "with" Ronnie?Nublar7 said:I agree. I would like to keep Ricky, but we should use him the same way in 2006 as we did in 2005. Splitting carries last year between Ronnie and Ricky was great!
bla bla bla said:As much as it pains me to say it, I prefer Ricky to Ronnie. If I need ten yards to ice a game, I give it to Ricky each and every time.
Nublar7 said:I agree. I would like to keep Ricky, but we should use him the same way in 2006 as we did in 2005. Splitting carries last year between Ronnie and Ricky was great!
Ronnie would be the most expensive fullback to ever grace the NFL. If he gets a significant amout less carries than Ricky in his second year, it will be real hard to justify picking him. Ronnie will be pissed to.finfan54 said:I disagree, I think its time to make Ronnie Brown a FB except with passing game and running game in mind and set the O up that way from the start since RW will be playing from the start. They can also split carries that way. But I want to see Ronnie going in motion and going out for passes. I think having both in at the same time, except with running plays as well in the design, would make us unstoppable.
DolphinDevil28 said:I'm glad we're keeping Ricky, but the "featured" back???
Man, Ronnie's too damn good for that.
finfan54 said:works for me. Now lets get RB involved at FB and the passing game.
tylerdolphin said:If he gets a significant amout less carries than Ricky in his second year, it will be real hard to justify picking him. Ronnie will be pissed to.