First off, this review, along with thoughts from Simon Clancy (Boomer) and Richard Lines (Conuficus) can now be found on the Fort Lauderdale Sun Sentinel under Dave Hyde's blog section. Here is the link:
http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/spo...g/2010/04/analyzing_the_dolphins_draft_t.html
Now let me see if I can't get to some of your questions.
PhinsTD, I don't think that FS is the most important position in a defense and neither does the NFL for the most part. If it were then free safeties wouldn't be so underpaid relative to other positions. I think actually that strong safety can be more important. Closer to the line of scrimmage, more opportunities to make plays. On the other hand the Dolphins view both safety positions very fluidly and so it doesn't really matter to them whether Reshad will play FS or SS, as much as it matters to us.
TedSlimmJr I agree with everything you wrote.
vafin72, I have three possible reasons why Clay Matthews goes #24 or #26 wherever he went, where Misi went #40. One is, as Awsi Dooger recently pointed out, the conference where Misi played had a different level of overall talent than Matthews played against. If he looks great on tape versus inferior players, that's not going to help him much in the NFL. Two is, at USC the NFL coaches know that those players were getting high quality defensive coaching, and I don't think they *know* that as much with the Utah coaching, which isn't exactly a knock on Utah's coaches. Three is, personnel evaluators have been regarding this draft as particularly thick in that #12 to #40 area, where last year might not have been so much, and so if Misi was in last year's draft rather than this year's, he might have gotten pushed up a little further by a lack of talent.