They may have dominated the defenses but their defenses got dominated also, there were close games against teams that shouldn't have been close.
Bottom Line, Texas has a top 10 ranked offense AND defense, USC has top 10 ranked offense and a defense ranked in the 60s.
Texas's offense beats USC's in some categories
USC's defense beats Texas' offense in ZERO categories, and losses BY FAR, any catageory opffensively that Texas gives up to USC isn't by more than a few rank spots.
So, a top ranked offense + top ranked defense > top ranked offense + very low ranked defense.
Not garunteeing a Texas win, but I will garuntee it isn't a repeat of last year vs OU. It will be close, a shootout that Texas should win because their D can get more key stops than USC's D.
and Like FishyPete said, BUSH is USC, not Leinart. Leinart makes plenty of mistakes, and I have noticed that he pads his stats against crappy teams but when he plays tough oponents he makes his mistakes, liek throwing INTs when the ball should have never been thrown, throwing off-target etc etc.
Once you start putting FACTS behind your arguments then people can take them seriously. Your "because I say so" logic is so elementary school it's ridiculous. It obviously doesn't work out to well for you either Mr. "UCLA is a much tougher oponent for USC than Fresno State, PERIOD, if you disagree you are wrong" HA, good job buddy, too bad Fresno almost had em (like I said) and UCLA got SLAUGHTERED.