We signed two safeties, either of which could become starters. One IOL who is likely to be a starter, so far, so how does that equate to safety being more likely than a tackle-to-guard convert at 13?
Huh?? not good in coverage? WTF? Coverage is his wheelhouse. He's a fricking ballhawk.
He gives up a catch rate of over 70%. Not very good.
The home of the UC-Santa Cruz Banana Slugs. :)
Look at his yards per target and passer rating in his coverage over the last three seasons. Granted his first two seasons he struggled. Now, three in a row he's been very good.
Jesus H Christ on a bike with a whore on the handlebars.
Are you in Junior High or something?
Come on, It is like every player Miami signed is the best in the word. If Davis is starting at Saftey that is not good. Ya he has some picks, but gambles, QBs complete 70% on him and 9 tds as well. There is a reason he lost his starting job on the Jets. He is a depth Saftey, is want he is.
I'm not squinting and I'm not getting creative.
Free agency has barely gotten started. Did you conclude that unless we made early splash signings at safety we were locked into drafting one at 13? Even if they don't sign any other safeties, there are plenty of options in the draft in the mid-rounds. Safety is a dime-a-dozen position. Unless a rare player like Reed or Polamalu is available, it is better to pick one in the 2nd through 4th. Holland and Moehrig were 2s. Reid was a 3, and Bynum was a 4, for example.
Calm down it was half joking about locked in at 13 for safety. But it would be a Grier special to dig a hole at a position, then everyone knows you have a massive hole.
Every single word of your post could not possibly be more true.
