Interesting take. It seems you're defining a "choker" vs. a "gamer?" Mental tuffness and playing to WIN with confidence vs. playing scared and not really believing in yourself. In terms of that dynamic being critical @QB (in the positive sense) I 100% agree. Your take reminds me a tad of handicapping a horse race -- of which I know very little about tho I've been shown some things and told some things by folks that did it professionally. Anyway not to sidetrack but the analysis of the mental side is pretty rare around here and you are 100% correct --- it's a huge factor.I know what you mean regarding Herbert. He won all the sucker categories last season but it remains to be seen if he can raise his alpha level to the point he dictates victories instead of crying on the sideline in disbelief that good things are actually happening to him. The Ryan Tannehill comparison is very apt. Tannehill didn't expect to win big games. He was shocked when it actually happened, dating to college. That's the type of personality you have to avoid at that position. It is a natural regulator. I thought Justin Herbert crying after the Rose Bowl win over Wisconsin was a huge red flag in that regard and nothing from his rookie season deflected from it.
Comebacks are for suckers, as I've always emphasized. Bet games for a living and that aspect stands out in a hurry. Justin Herbert last season blew one close game after another early in the season to forge a won/loss record that wasn't close to what it should have been given the overall caliber of that team including so many good defensive stats. Then he made the familiar sucker comeback late season to win a string of games once none of them mattered anymore. No matter what his physical skills look like, I'll be very surprised if Justin Herbert becomes the type of quarterback who monopolizes victories. He played one pivotal game at Oregon with a final four berth on the line. And it was one of his most pathetic efforts ever, the loss at Arizona State as 14 point favorite. And even that game followed the typical pattern for a player like that. Herbert made so many mistakes his team was buried in the middle of the fourth quarter. Then he relaxed once he understood the outcome was inevitable and padded his stats while making the final score respectable.
The question with Tua is whether his physical capabilities are up to league requirement. If so, then there's no question he would have no problem ruthlessly dictating the league. I still think the Dolphins made a mistake in trading down from 3. A second swing at an elite quarterback prospect is worth exponentially more than one swing at a quarterback plus a wide receiver and a future first round pick. With Justin Fields, for example, there is likewise no question that he has the mental makeup to fully anticipate one victory after another, no matter the opponent or situation. The question with Fields is what happens on those key intermediate throws? He can make all the big ones. The league doesn't know how Justin Fields will fare on 3rd and 10 when he has to quickly decipher the window and throw before it's necessarily open.
Guys that fold under pressure rarely completely solve that problem. As far as Herbert -- you may be correct about him and time will definitely tell. Apparently this deal of playing QB in the NFL is vastly more difficult than we really understand. And for sure --- a lot of it is in the head.
Reminds me again why Marino was so transcendent at his best ----- dude was a ruthless tuff competitor and had the physical skills to destroy a defense. I'm sure the fact he never played on a championship team really burns him inside and in so many ways undercuts his absolute greatness. But it's impossible to win championships in the NFL when the supporting cast is lacking and incomplete.
Last edited: