ckparrothead
Premium Member
I would rather keep OGUN, however it is a reality situation. If he wants too much money, Miami can't afford to keep OGUN. No one thinks this guy is a bum, they just think he is replaceable.
Plus if OGUN really was as good as people here like to think, there would be a few teams willing to give their first round pick for him. Best I heard so far, was the Bears who wanted to give up a 2nd.
Echo my thoughts precisely. I like him I think he's an 7 or 8 sack guy on most other teams and he plays the run pretty well so he's a good DE. But he's not worth the money doled out to Grant Wistrom and Jevon Kearse and thats what he wants (at the very least). This is why I've been lookin in the draft I believe we can get a 5 to 7 sack guy in the draft that ends up with double digit sacks sometime in his first couple years...or at worst we get another healthy rotation and get that steady 21 to 22 sacks coming from the other side of JT.
I dont like how everyone acts like we've got him in our pocket and therefore they say "how could you give up the conference sack leader for ______"
We don't have him in our pocket. We have him for one more year. One more year at $2 million. Then, we franchise him, he gets paid by us, or leaves. We have room this year so its not like we'll somehow be able to afford him next year as opposed to this year, and franchising him would be out of the question because of the $7+ million cap figure he'd have.
So you have to balance what its worth to have Adewale Ogunleye on our roster for 2004, vs what we end up getting for him in trade (a draft pick or two that is almost guaranteed to be on our roster for 4 years at a bargain rate).
If you could have Ogunleye for JUST the 2004 season then he leaves, or you could have 2 second round draft picks...which would you take?
BTW NathanHunt my answer is I might do that but only because we could then go on to trade back from pick #3 and acquire possibly 2 first round picks and maybe more. There is nobody in the top 5 that I feel like would be great value for us to trade up to get him. Its one of those things where sure if you've already got the #3 pick fine, but if you're trading up to get a safety like Sean Taylor...well I love Taylor think he'll be dominant but he's still just a safety. The only other guy I feel is good value up there is Robert Gallery or maybe Big Ben. Supposedly Wade Smith is set to become a good LT, and though I firmly believe he can play RT, his best position would be LT. He could move to LG but Jeno James is already there. Grabbing Robert Gallery does not fulfill our RT needs for the future though it gives us a multitude of options for the present...and besides, #3 might not even be high enough to get Gallery. Count Dracula Davis could grab him he loves guys like Gallery.
As for the QBs I think Rivers is the best value QB on the board. The others might be taken a little higher than maybe they should. I'm not terribly impressed with them...plus we grabbed Feeley for better or worst and that 2nd rounder means he deserves a shot.