Looks like a guard, plays like a guard, tested like a guard, should plan guard.Huh? Whoever takes Sewell, isn't moving him to Guard.
Looks like a guard, plays like a guard, tested like a guard, should plan guard.Huh? Whoever takes Sewell, isn't moving him to Guard.
Just like Dan Marino, guess we don't need a QB.Because Jake Long brought them so many championships...
Let's dial it down to where you think your logic applies.Just like Dan Marino, guess we don't need a QB.
Just like the most ridiculous CB tandem ever Surtain and Madison, guess we don't need CBS either.
Your logic is flawless.
You sit are right about that but you originally mentioned “quite a few mocks” and “sliding to the end of the first” both which may be less than accurate.
it's a little different when one of the many picks you got for the first tackle is used to pick the second tackle (in your example).Only our fanbase could trade away an OT that despite being one of the best in the league didn't do much to move the needle on our offense or the offense that he went to, luck out and get a higher pick than anticipated for him... and then want to turn around and spend the pick on another tackle.
When do you guys learn your lesson?
Yeah, okI never said "sliding to the end of the first" like you quoted me as saying. You should be more careful when you use quotes...
Yeah, ok
Yeah, okHe didn't. He said exactly what he says he did in your quote word for word.
You do realize they can draft Sewell at 6 and still select a WR and RB in the top 50 picks? Just because they select the best offensive tackle in the draft doesn’t mean they won’t also upgrade the skill position players on offense.Let's dial it down to where you think your logic applies.
What was the average offensive ranking of the Dolphins during Long's years instead? Sure, blaming him for no championships is silly, but how about his role on an offense to make it effective. How much did Tunsil help Houston's offense?
I'm sure you'll find that his point isn't as far off as you think.
You do realize they can draft Sewell at 6 and still select a WR and RB in the top 50 picks? Just because they select the best offensive tackle in the draft doesn’t mean they won’t also upgrade the skill position players on offense.
It just means they likely won’t be able to draft one of the top 3 WR’s or Pitts but there are suppose to be some very talented WR’s who will still be available through the first two rounds.
By later rounds do u mean picks 18, 36, and 50?I mean sure you can find an elite WR in later rounds. Do you trust Grier to find one there?
They can. I'm just arguing it's a misuse of capital and prioritization.You do realize they can draft Sewell at 6 and still select a WR and RB in the top 50 picks? Just because they select the best offensive tackle in the draft doesn’t mean they won’t also upgrade the skill position players on offense.
It just means they likely won’t be able to draft one of the top 3 WR’s or Pitts but there are suppose to be some very talented WR’s who will still be available through the first two rounds.